Skip to content

Conversation

@ethanholen-hpe
Copy link
Contributor

Summary and Scope

capture sat logs when running sat functional tests

Issues and Related PRs

List and characterize relationship to Jira/Github issues and other pull requests. Be sure to list dependencies.

  • Resolves CRAYSAT-2045
  • Change will also be needed in <insert branch name here>
  • Future work required by [issue id](issue link)
  • Documentation changes required in [issue id](issue link)
  • Merge with/before/after <insert PR URL here>

Testing

List the environments in which these changes were tested.

Tested on:

  • <development system>
  • Local development environment
  • Virtual Shasta

Test description:

How were the changes tested and success verified? If schema changes were part of this change, how were those handled in your upgrade/downgrade testing?

  • Were the install/upgrade-based validation checks/tests run (goss tests/install-validation doc)?
  • Were continuous integration tests run? If not, why?
  • Was upgrade tested? If not, why?
  • Was downgrade tested? If not, why?
  • Were new tests (or test issues/Jiras) created for this change?

Risks and Mitigations

Are there known issues with these changes? Any other special considerations?

Pull Request Checklist

  • Version number(s) incremented, if applicable
  • Copyrights updated
  • License file intact
  • Target branch correct
  • CHANGELOG.md updated
  • Testing is appropriate and complete, if applicable
  • HPC Product Announcement prepared, if applicable

@ethanholen-hpe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants