Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
@firemountain154B Can you do a quick test on the hardware side to make sure Cocotb works? I had a slight worry here -- I thought we locked cocotb to 1.8 for a reason... |
Collaborator
Author
|
|
Contributor
Currently, the license of QuestaSim is out of date on any imperial service, and seems they don't have any plan to re-subscribe it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
coco-tbsetencepiecepytorch==2.6testing script
Huggingface is also a bit problematic, because it seems in the new version, their
model.config.problem_typeis changed in their upstream, this would cause transforming tofxfail on some old models, for instance, thisbert-tiny, the workaround is to reassign that problem type on the fly.