Security vulnerability assessment for DigiDollar stablecoin module

[Copilot]

Security Vulnerability Assessment of DigiByte Core

Plan Checklist:

• Initial security audit completed
• Security findings documented with >80% confidence
• Code review feedback addressed
• Detailed remediation plans added for all 5 issues

Findings Summary:

ID	Title	Severity	Remediation Status
DGB-SEC-001	Integer Overflow in Collateral Ratio Validation	HIGH	Plan documented
DGB-SEC-002	Division by Zero in DCA Health Calculation	MEDIUM	Plan documented
DGB-SEC-003	Oracle Timestamp Validation Weakness	MEDIUM	Plan documented
DGB-SEC-004	Unbounded Script Execution	LOW	Plan documented
DGB-SEC-005	Verbose Logging Information Disclosure	INFORMATIONAL	Plan documented

Remediation Plans Include:

• Step-by-step implementation instructions with code samples
• Before/after code comparisons
• Unit test templates
• Verification procedures
• Implementation priority matrix
• Testing strategy (pre-deployment, staging, production)
• Estimated effort: 6.5 days total

Full details in SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md

Original prompt

You are a senior security researcher specializing in cryptocurrency and blockchain security audits. You have deep expertise in: - C++ memory safety and undefined behavior exploitation - Bitcoin Core architecture and its derivatives - Cryptographic implementation vulnerabilities - Peer-to-peer network protocol attacks - Consensus mechanism exploitation - Smart contract and transaction validation flaws

Your security audits have identified critical vulnerabilities in production blockchain systems. You approach code review methodically, understanding that even minor oversights in cryptocurrency code can result in catastrophic financial losses or network-wide attacks.

<repository_context>
You are auditing the DigiByte Core repository (https://github.com/DigiByte-Core/digibyte).

DigiByte is a UTXO-based cryptocurrency forked from Bitcoin Core with these unique characteristics:

• Multi-algorithm mining (5 algorithms: SHA256, Scrypt, Groestl, Skein, Qubit)
• DigiShield/MultiShield difficulty adjustment mechanisms
• SegWit support (activated April 2017)
• 15-second block times
• DigiAssets layer for tokenization
• Digi-ID authentication protocol

The codebase is primarily C++ with Python test scripts. Understanding Bitcoin Core's architecture is essential for effective analysis.
</repository_context>

Perform a comprehensive security vulnerability assessment of the provided code. Your analysis must be thorough yet precise—flag only issues where you have HIGH CONFIDENCE (>80%) of actual exploitability in a real-world attack scenario.

This precision is critical because:

1. False positives waste developer time and erode trust in security tooling
2. Cryptocurrency vulnerabilities have direct financial consequences
3. The DigiByte community relies on accurate assessments to prioritize fixes

<vulnerability_categories>
Focus your analysis on these high-impact vulnerability classes relevant to cryptocurrency systems:

C++ memory corruption vulnerabilities that could enable code execution or denial of service - Buffer overflows in serialization/deserialization (CDataStream, CSerialize) - Use-after-free in transaction/block handling - Integer overflows in amount calculations (CAmount arithmetic) - Uninitialized memory in cryptographic contexts - Double-free in wallet or mempool operations - Stack exhaustion via recursive data structures Pay special attention to: - CScript parsing and execution - CTxIn/CTxOut handling - Block deserialization boundaries - Merkle tree construction Bugs that could cause chain splits, enable double-spends, or violate consensus rules - Inconsistent validation between nodes - Time-related edge cases (nLockTime, CSV, block timestamps) - Signature validation bypasses (ECDSA, Schnorr) - SegWit witness validation errors - Difficulty calculation errors (especially in MultiShield logic) - Coinbase maturity violations - Script evaluation differences DigiByte-specific consensus areas: - Multi-algorithm difficulty adjustment logic - DigiShield block timing calculations - Algorithm-specific block validation - Cross-algorithm attack vectors Weaknesses in cryptographic implementations or protocol design - Weak randomness (insufficient entropy, predictable nonces) - Timing side-channels in signature operations - Key derivation weaknesses (HD wallet paths) - Hash collision vulnerabilities - Signature malleability issues - Replay attack vectors P2P protocol vulnerabilities enabling network-level attacks - Remote denial of service (malformed messages, resource exhaustion) - Eclipse attacks (connection manipulation) - Sybil attack vectors - Message parsing vulnerabilities - Peer scoring manipulation - DNS seed poisoning vectors Attacks that can exhaust node resources without proportional cost - Mempool flooding attacks - Block propagation delays - UTXO set bloat - Orphan transaction accumulation - Validation computational complexity attacks - Disk I/O amplification Vulnerabilities affecting user funds or wallet integrity - Private key exposure (logging, memory, core dumps) - Insufficient fee validation (fee sniping, dust attacks) - Address reuse facilitation - Watch-only wallet privilege escalation - Backup/restore vulnerabilities - HD key derivation path collisions Vulner...

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[gto90]

@copilot , please prepare detailed remediation plans for each issue identified.

[Copilot]

@copilot , please prepare detailed remediation plans for each issue identified.

Added detailed remediation plans for all 5 issues in commit 8a46d94. Each plan includes:

• Step-by-step implementation instructions with before/after code samples
• Unit test templates for verification
• Verification procedures and code review checklists
• Implementation priority matrix (Phase 1-3)
• Testing strategy for pre-deployment, staging, and production

Estimated total effort: 6.5 days, with DGB-SEC-001 (HIGH) prioritized for immediate implementation.

[DigiSwarm]

Closing — this is a vulnerability report with no code changes.

This PR is a markdown security assessment document (ADDITIONAL_BUGS_FOUND.md) with no actual code fixes. All the bugs identified in this report have already been addressed on feature/digidollar-v1:

• Overflow in collateral calculations → Fixed via __int128 arithmetic
• Division by zero in health/DCA → Fixed in commits merged from PR security: [T1-06] fix division by zero in CalculateSystemHealth() (DGB-SEC-003) #375
• Oracle signature bypass → Fixed in T1-05a overnight
• Oracle ID truncation → Fixed in commits merged from PR security: [T1-07] reject oracle_id > 255 to prevent truncation (DGB-SEC-004) #376
• Mock oracle on non-regtest → Fixed in commits merged from PR security: [T1-08] add regtest-only runtime guards to MockOracleManager (DGB-SEC-005) #377
• Array bounds in GetAlgo → Fixed in commits merged from PR Fix array bounds bug in multi-algo block index tracking #369

Appreciate the thorough audit — the findings were solid and led to real fixes. But the report itself does not belong as a PR since there are no code changes to merge.