Skip to content

[Onyx Audit] Reset internal useOnyx state on key change#756

Merged
cristipaval merged 8 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:JKobrynski/fix/85416-fix-useonyx-state-not-resetting
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[Onyx Audit] Reset internal useOnyx state on key change#756
cristipaval merged 8 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:JKobrynski/fix/85416-fix-useonyx-state-not-resetting

Conversation

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JKobrynski JKobrynski commented Mar 20, 2026

Details

Related Issues

GH_LINK Expensify/App#85416

Automated Tests

Unit tests were added for the new logic.

Manual Tests

  1. Log into the app
  2. Navigate between different chats quickly
  3. Open an expense, go back, open a different expense
  4. Go to the search screen and perform multiple searches one after another
  5. Open a report via deep link, then navigate to a different one

In all of the cases above look out for:

  • No stale data flash - when switching between items, you shouldn't briefly see the previous item's data
  • Proper loading states - the hook should transition through loading → loaded for the new key
  • No crashes - the old code threw errors for non-collection dynamic key changes; your branch removes that restriction, so arbitrary key changes should work now

Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Related Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web-compressed.mov

@JKobrynski JKobrynski marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2026 14:13
@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2026 14:13
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from cristipaval and removed request for a team March 20, 2026 14:14
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8450987afc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

lib/useOnyx.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +135 to +139
if (key !== previousKey) {
previousValueRef.current = null;
newValueRef.current = null;
isFirstConnectionRef.current = true;
shouldGetCachedValueRef.current = true;
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep the new key in first-connection mode until its callback arrives

Resetting previousValueRef and isFirstConnectionRef here interacts badly with the existing subscribe() cleanup. On a key change, the old subscription still cleans up and sets isFirstConnectionRef.current = false before the new Onyx.connect() callback fires. If anything rerenders the component in that window (for example a parent/context update while the new key is loading from storage), getSnapshot() takes its previousValueRef.current === null && !isFirstConnectionRef.current path and marks the new key as {status: 'loaded'} even though the initial callback for that key has not arrived yet.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JKobrynski please check.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we still worry about this @JKobrynski ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was valid for an earlier revision that used a boolean isFirstConnectionRef, but the current code replaces it with connectedKeyRef which stores the actual key string. The "is first connection" check is now connectedKeyRef.current !== key, which is structurally immune to this race:

  • Cleanup sets connectedKeyRef.current = null
  • subscribe() doesn't touch it
  • Only the Onyx callback sets it to the new key

So between cleanup and the callback firing, connectedKeyRef.current is null, and null !== newKey is always true — meaning isFirstConnection stays true throughout that window. If getSnapshot() runs during a mid-window re-render, previousValueRef.current === null && !isFirstConnection evaluates to false, so the hook correctly stays in loading state until the actual callback arrives.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Krishna2323 commented Mar 20, 2026

Reviewing...

@fabioh8010
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would like to review it too

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Let's hold the PR a bit so it can be reviewed internally as well.

CC: @Krishna2323

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@fabioh8010 I updated the PR with your solutions, take a look!

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Krishna2323 I had a discussion with Fabio on Slack, he greenlighted the current solution, so the PR is all yours now!

@shubham1206agra some time ago you asked about a weird Onyx issue on Slack, we're most likely going to fix it with this PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fabioh8010 fabioh8010 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forgot to push this review 🙈

Comment on lines +287 to +293
// Reset internal state so the hook properly transitions through loading
// for the new key instead of preserving stale state from the previous one.
previousValueRef.current = null;
newValueRef.current = null;
shouldGetCachedValueRef.current = true;
sourceValueRef.current = undefined;
resultRef.current = [undefined, {status: options?.initWithStoredValues === false ? 'loaded' : 'loading'}];
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe could we extract this into a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only if it won't complicate any further @JKobrynski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, we could but I'm not sure what would be the benefit? It's not reused anywhere and the placement seems self-explanatory to me, is there anything that I'm missing? 😄

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah you are right!

rerender(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TEST_KEY}2`);
});
} catch (e) {
fail("Expected to don't throw any errors.");
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
fail("Expected to don't throw any errors.");
fail("Expected to not throw any errors.");

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, done

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Will start reviewing this today.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Krishna2323 commented Mar 27, 2026

Reviewing...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall. A few suggestions:

  1. lib/usePrevious.ts is no longer imported anywhere -- should we delete it?

  2. Test "should return cached value immediately..." doesn't actually assert synchronously after rerender(). Consider adding a check right after rerender() before waitForPromisesToResolve() to match the title, or adjusting the title.

  3. Would be nice to add tests for:

    • Switching between non-collection keys (e.g., TEST_KEY to TEST_KEY_2) since the PR description mentions arbitrary key changes now work
    • initWithStoredValues: false with dynamic keys
    • A → B → A round-trip (returning to a previously used key)

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Krishna2323 done! Let me know what you think

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Krishna2323 kindly bump 🙏

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewing...

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Krishna2323 commented Mar 31, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android_hybrid.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_mWeb.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ios_hybrid.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_mWeb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and works well! 🚀

@cristipaval cristipaval merged commit 9f09be3 into Expensify:main Apr 1, 2026
10 checks passed
@os-botify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

os-botify bot commented Apr 1, 2026

🚀 Published to npm in 3.0.59 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants