Skip to content

Back to original action for UX #3387

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Jack251970
Copy link
Contributor

Follow on with #3150

Copy link

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
❌ forbidden-pattern 22
⚠️ ignored-expect-variant 1
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 19

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 enabled auto-merge March 26, 2025 12:24
@Jack251970 Jack251970 added the Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build label Mar 26, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 added this to the 1.20.0 milestone Mar 26, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 requested a review from onesounds March 26, 2025 12:25
Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change modifies the CreateResultsFromQuery method in the Flow.Launcher.Plugin.ProcessKiller/Main.cs file. The return value of the process killing action has been changed from returning false to returning true to indicate a successful operation after killing a process and re-querying the process list. Additionally, a comment was added to clarify that the re-query is performed following the process termination.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.ProcessKiller/Main.cs Changed return value from false to true after process kill and re-query, and added clarifying comments.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Plugin
    participant Process
    User->>Plugin: Initiate process kill action
    Plugin->>Process: Kill target process
    Plugin->>Plugin: Re-query process list
    Plugin-->>User: Return success (true)
Loading

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • jjw24

Poem

I'm a hopping rabbit in code so neat,
Kicking bugs off with a joyful beat.
A process killed, a re-query in line,
Success now returned with a brilliant sign.
Cheers to clean code and a breeze so sweet!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 773fb8d and 8747442.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.ProcessKiller/Main.cs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.ProcessKiller/Main.cs (2)

157-159: Action now closes the UI after killing the process.

The change from returning false to true in the action delegate means the Flow Launcher UI will close after killing a process, rather than staying open as before. This appears to be an intentional UX improvement, returning to original behavior as mentioned in the PR title. The added comment also improves code clarity.


184-186: Action now closes the UI after killing multiple processes.

Similar to the individual process action, this change makes the UI close after killing multiple processes. This creates consistent behavior between the single and multi-process kill actions. The added comment clarifies that the process list is refreshed after the operation.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 merged commit 7c009d4 into Flow-Launcher:dev Mar 26, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants