Skip to content

Fix Application.Current null exception #3401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Jack251970
Copy link
Contributor

Fix this exception:

Screenshot 2025-03-30 145619

@Jack251970 Jack251970 requested a review from Copilot March 30, 2025 07:00
@prlabeler prlabeler bot added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 30, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 requested a review from onesounds March 30, 2025 07:00
@Jack251970 Jack251970 enabled auto-merge March 30, 2025 07:00
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request addresses the Application.Current null exception by adding null-checks before invoking Dispatcher methods on Application.Current.

  • Updated calls to Dispatcher.Invoke to use a null-conditional operator.
  • Adjusted comments to reflect the possibility of Application.Current being null during application exit.

@Jack251970
Copy link
Contributor Author

Small patch and it is good to me.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Mar 30, 2025

🥷 Code experts: onesounds

Jack251970, onesounds have most 👩‍💻 activity in the files.
Jack251970, onesounds have most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs

Activity based on git-commit:

Jack251970 onesounds
MAR 483 additions & 435 deletions 293 additions & 201 deletions
FEB 63 additions & 21 deletions 23 additions & 25 deletions
JAN 17 additions & 21 deletions
DEC 59 additions & 63 deletions
NOV 39 additions & 15 deletions
OCT

Knowledge based on git-blame:
Jack251970: 26%
onesounds: 10%

To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change updates the MainViewModel class's Show and Hide methods. The update adds a null-conditional check for Application.Current before using the UI dispatcher, preventing potential null reference exceptions during application exit. Additionally, comment text was refined for clarity, including the correction of a typo.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Flow.Launcher/.../MainViewModel.cs Modified Show and Hide methods to use the null-conditional operator when accessing Application.Current and updated comments for clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant VM as MainViewModel
    participant App as Application.Current
    participant UI as Dispatcher/UI Thread

    VM->>App: Check if Application.Current exists (null-conditional)
    alt Application exists
        App->>UI: Invoke UI operation via dispatcher
    else
        VM-->>VM: Skip UI operation (safe exit)
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jjw24
  • taooceros

Poem

I'm a hopping rabbit, glad to say,
Our code now skips the null display,
With safe checks here to guard the run,
No more crashes when the day's done.
Hoppin' with joy, our bugs have fled—
CodeRabbit cheers, and so do I, ahead!
🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f07c09f and aec4539.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Flow.Launcher/ViewModel/MainViewModel.cs (2)

1467-1470: Good addition of null check to prevent NRE!

Adding the null-conditional operator (?.) is a solid defensive coding practice that prevents null reference exceptions when Application.Current is null during application shutdown.


1542-1545: Good addition of null check to prevent NRE!

Similar to the change in the Show method, this null check in the Hide method prevents potential null reference exceptions during application shutdown.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
❌ forbidden-pattern 22
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 19

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 added Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build and removed bug Something isn't working 1 min review labels Mar 30, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 added this to the 1.20.0 milestone Mar 30, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 requested a review from Copilot March 30, 2025 07:05
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request addresses the Application.Current null exception by updating UI thread invocations in the Show() and Hide() methods.

  • Updated invocation calls to use the null-conditional operator in both Show() and Hide()
  • Revised comments to clarify behavior when Application.Current is null during application exit

@Jack251970 Jack251970 merged commit d2cfa7f into dev Mar 30, 2025
14 checks passed
@Jack251970 Jack251970 deleted the application_current_null branch March 30, 2025 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dev branch only An issue or fix for the Dev branch build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants