Python coverage improvements #245
Conversation
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| try: | ||
| config[42] # should raise | ||
| assert not "did not raise TypeError" | ||
| except TypeError: |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Empty except Note test
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (76.93%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #245 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.25% 76.93% +0.68%
==========================================
Files 124 124
Lines 2733 2736 +3
Branches 475 475
==========================================
+ Hits 2084 2105 +21
+ Misses 452 439 -13
+ Partials 197 192 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
|
||
| class AddableProtocol[T](Protocol): | ||
| """Typer bound for any types that can be added.""" | ||
| def __add__(self, other: T) -> T: ... # noqa: D105 |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Statement has no effect Note test
1 participant
Improvements to Python test coverage and fixes for issues thus uncovered. This code introduces a helper for annotating the same Python function for different C++ types, which is similar functionality as is being provided by #213, which would benefit from this helper.