Skip to content

feat: add ramification and inertia computations for primes in Z[sqrt(-5)]#4

Open
FrankieeW wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
ramification-inertia-computation
Open

feat: add ramification and inertia computations for primes in Z[sqrt(-5)]#4
FrankieeW wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
ramification-inertia-computation

Conversation

@FrankieeW
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1713a8ffe1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

-- From h' : P2^2 ≤ P2^3, we get P2^2 ≤ P2, contradiction with P2^2 < P2
rw [ideal_2_factorization, pow_succ, mul_comm] at h'
-- exact (pow_succ_lt_pow P2.isPrime.ne_zero (n := 1)).not_le h'
sorry
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Prove ramification/inertia theorems before committing

ramificationIdx_2, inertiaDeg_2, ramificationIdx_3_P3plus, inertiaDeg_3_P3plus, ramificationIdx_3_P3minus, and inertiaDeg_3_P3minus are all finished with sorry, so Lean accepts them via sorryAx rather than checked proofs. If ANT.RamificationInertia is imported, downstream developments can rely on these equalities even when they are wrong, which makes the formalized ramification/inertia computations unsound.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Prove that the ramification index of the prime 2 in Z[√-5] is 2,
using the mathlib definition Ideal.ramificationIdx. The proof uses
the factorization (2) = P² where P = ⟨2, 1+√-5⟩, showing that
the image of (2) is contained in P² but not in P³.

Add ANT.RamificationInertia module with:
- Prime ideal definitions P2, P3plus, P3minus
- Ideal factorization theorems
- ramificationIdx_2 proof (complete)
- Placeholder sorries for inertiaDeg and remaining ramificationIdx proofs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant