Skip to content

Conversation

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor

Types of change(s)

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Trivial change (affects only documentation or cleanup)
  • Refactor (no functional changes, no api changes)

Checklist

  • Tested this change with a run of GEOSgcm
  • Ran the Unit Tests (make tests)

Description

for discussion

Related Issue

@weiyuan-jiang weiyuan-jiang requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2025 18:09
@weiyuan-jiang weiyuan-jiang added the 🚫 Contingent - DNA Do Not Approve (DNA). These changes are contingent on other PRs label Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

This PR is being prevented from merging because you have added one of our blocking labels: 🚫 Contingent - DNA. You'll need to remove it before this PR can be merged.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

This PR is being prevented from merging because you have not added one of our required labels: 0 diff, 0 diff trivial, 😲 Non 0 Diff, 🔧 Github Actions. Please add one so that the PR can be merged.

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

This PR is being prevented from merging because you have not added one of our required labels: 0 diff, 0 diff trivial, 😲 Non 0 Diff, 🔧 Github Actions. Please add one so that the PR can be merged.

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member

mathomp4 commented Dec 9, 2025

Huh. Lots of CI failures. ninja seems unhappy with:

ninja: build stopped: multiple rules generate mesh2/sf_direction.mod.

As for ifx, not sure. Seems like our spurious random failure.

Also from GNU:

Error copying Fortran module "mesh2/sf_direction.mod".  Tried "mesh2/SF_DIRECTION.mod" and "mesh2/sf_direction.mod".
make[2]: *** [mesh2/CMakeFiles/to_mesh2.x.dir/depend.make:7: mesh2/CMakeFiles/to_mesh2.x.dir/sf_direction.mod.stamp] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:9260: mesh2/CMakeFiles/to_mesh2.x.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[ 89%] Building Fortran object mesh2/CMakeFiles/xgrid.x.dir/Direction.F90.o
Error copying Fortran module "mesh2/sf_direction.mod".  Tried "mesh2/SF_DIRECTION.mod" and "mesh2/sf_direction.mod".
make[2]: *** [mesh2/CMakeFiles/xgrid2.x.dir/depend.make:7: mesh2/CMakeFiles/xgrid2.x.dir/sf_direction.mod.stamp] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:9356: mesh2/CMakeFiles/xgrid2.x.dir/all] Error 2

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

There are a few make_esmf_mesh subroutines. My tests show only the one works. @tclune, We should clean those up

@tclune
Copy link
Collaborator

tclune commented Dec 16, 2025

There are a few make_esmf_mesh subroutines. My tests show only the one works. @tclune, We should clean those up

Please do. The extra copies were all just attempts to work around an unknown issue.

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notes:
With the latest update, time mpirun -np 6 ./xgrid2.x
multi_connections: 49 s
ordered multi_connections: 38 s

tri_conn : 83 S
ordered tri_conn 75 s

quad_conn gets error when creating handler from xgrid to latlon grid:

pe=00002 FAIL at line=00085 xgrid2.F90 <status=513>

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member

Notes: With the latest update, time mpirun -np 6 ./xgrid2.x multi_connections: 49 s ordered multi_connections: 38 s

tri_conn : 83 S ordered tri_conn 75 s

quad_conn gets error when creating handler from xgrid to latlon grid:

pe=00002 FAIL at line=00085 xgrid2.F90 <status=513>

@weiyuan-jiang Just for my own benefit, are these good? Bad? That is, should "ordered tri_conn" be the best? quad_conn?

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notes: With the latest update, time mpirun -np 6 ./xgrid2.x multi_connections: 49 s ordered multi_connections: 38 s
tri_conn : 83 S ordered tri_conn 75 s
quad_conn gets error when creating handler from xgrid to latlon grid:
pe=00002 FAIL at line=00085 xgrid2.F90 <status=513>

@weiyuan-jiang Just for my own benefit, are these good? Bad? That is, should "ordered tri_conn" be the best? quad_conn?

After Bob made the change, the tri and quad are not necessary any more. Every thing will be the original version except we order the elements and vertices.

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

weiyuan-jiang commented Jan 23, 2026

For the record, here is the summary of xgrid.F90 print out ( mesh min resolution C1440, destination C720)

random (s) 96 pe Ordered (s) 96 pe ordered 216 pe ordered 864 pe
Creating xgrid (mesh, agrid) 6.3 4.7 2.15 0.59
Creating handle(Mesh 2 xgrid 6.0 2.1 1.4 1.14
Mesh 2 xgrid( regrid) 0.001 0.008 0.0006 0.0006
Creating handle(xgrid 2 agrid) 6.6 2.4 1.67 0.78
xgrid 2 mesh(regrid) 0.002 0.0009 0.0005 0.00016
Creating Handle(mesh 2 agrid) 7.3 3.67 1.97 1.4
Mesh 2 agrid(regrid) 0.002 0.0016 0.0007 0.002

@tclune
Copy link
Collaborator

tclune commented Jan 23, 2026

@weiyuan-jiang Please use triple back-ticks and spacing to make the table readable here.

@mathomp4
Copy link
Member

@weiyuan-jiang Please use triple back-ticks and spacing to make the table readable here.

I converted it into a Github Markdown Table. I forget those are available!

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@weiyuan-jiang Please use triple back-ticks and spacing to make the table readable here.

I converted it into a Github Markdown Table. I forget those are available!

That is nicer !

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

weiyuan-jiang commented Jan 29, 2026

Test for mesh minresolution c2880, destination c1440)

random (s) 96 pe Ordered (s) 96 pe ordered 216 pe ordered 864 pe
Creating xgrid (mesh, agrid) 31.3 22.5 10. 2.7
Creating handle(Mesh 2 xgrid) 34.4 10.7 7.7 7.0
Mesh 2 xgrid(regrid) 0.006 0.0037 0.0015 0.0008
Creating handle(xgrid 2 agrid) 11.6 11.6 8.6 7.3
xgrid 2 mesh(regrid) 0.0037 0.0037 0.0018 0.0006
Creating Handle(mesh 2 agrid) 44.0 19.1 11.2 7.6
Mesh 2 agrid(regrid) 0.004 0.0024 0.0014 0.002

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🚫 Contingent - DNA Do Not Approve (DNA). These changes are contingent on other PRs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants