Skip to content

Conversation

@MichaelRFairhurst
Copy link

It looked like #396 was an easy fix waiting to be picked up. Hoping this PR is an easy review and helpful.

Let me know if it seems better to use a mocking library; I didn't see any in use in the project and worked without it.

Also worth nothing: I did use TDD on this, that is to say, I know that this new test fails without the corresponding update to Visualize.display. However, the test in this design could stop being effective if parameter defaults are changed/methods are renamed/etc. If there's a better approach to testing this, I would be happy to change the test accordingly. It also may not be an important regression to keep as a test, if CI speed is an issue.

Cheers!

@KathleenLabrie
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Michael! We just noticed the PR.

Our in-house Jenkins test server cannot run on the PR probably because the changes are in your fork. We don't get external PRs very often. We're looking into defining a procedure.

The changes look good to me and we'll take them, once we got the Jenkins thing sorted.

Thanks for your contribution.

@KathleenLabrie KathleenLabrie self-requested a review April 1, 2025 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants