Skip to content

Conversation

@cowsking
Copy link
Contributor

@cowsking cowsking commented Jan 22, 2026

This PR updates the repository name generation for Secure Source Manager (SSM) in the E2E test framework by appending a stable suffix (e.g., -v2). This change addresses an inconsistent state in the kpt-config-sync-ci-release project where specific repository names have become unusable—reporting as "already existing" during creation but "not found" during describe or delete operations.

@google-oss-prow
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from cowsking. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @cowsking, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a modification to the E2E test framework to resolve persistent failures related to Secure Source Manager repository creation. By appending a version suffix to repository names, the system can bypass an existing inconsistent state in the test environment, ensuring that new repositories can be reliably created and managed during automated testing.

Highlights

  • SSM Repository Naming Fix: A stable suffix, "-v2", has been added to the repository name generation for Secure Source Manager (SSM) within the E2E test framework.
  • Addressing Inconsistent State: This change directly addresses an issue where specific repository names in the kpt-config-sync-ci-release project were in an inconsistent state, leading to creation failures despite not being found for description or deletion.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a workaround for an inconsistent state issue with SSM repositories in the E2E tests by appending a -v2 suffix to repository names. The change is straightforward and should resolve the test grid failures. My review includes a couple of suggestions to improve the code's maintainability by making the new comment more descriptive and refactoring the hardcoded version suffix into a constant.

}
}

// Add suffix for fullName to fix SSM testgrid failure

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This comment is a bit brief. To provide more context for future developers, it would be helpful to explain why the suffix is needed, summarizing the information from the PR description about the inconsistent SSM state.

Suggested change
// Add suffix for fullName to fix SSM testgrid failure
// Appending a version suffix to repository names to bypass an inconsistent state in SSM where some names are unusable.

// Add suffix for fullName to fix SSM testgrid failure
func (c *SSMClient) fullName(name string) string {
return util.SanitizeGCPRepoName(c.repoPrefix, name)
return util.SanitizeGCPRepoName(c.repoPrefix+"-v2", name)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The hardcoded "-v2" suffix is a 'magic string'. To improve readability and maintainability, it's best practice to define this as a package-level constant. This makes the code's intent clearer and simplifies future updates if the version needs to be incremented again (e.g., to "-v3").

You could add:

const ssmRepoVersionSuffix = "-v2"

And then use it here: c.repoPrefix + ssmRepoVersionSuffix.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants