Gauge derivative - 1/2 factor and gradient flow#38
Open
simone-romiti wants to merge 12 commits intomasterfrom
Open
Gauge derivative - 1/2 factor and gradient flow#38simone-romiti wants to merge 12 commits intomasterfrom
simone-romiti wants to merge 12 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
todo: write a program that can merge 2 .h5
…. 14 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-lat/9804008.pdf. They are the same as before, no previous result needs to be changed
… format more easily readable by hadron. To do: - write the documentation on why this is done separately and not in the c++ code - change the script such that the data in the old format can be removed - generalize the script to do the same also for the correlators
script can be used for correlators and interpolators
HighFive dependence now optional modified: hadron/glueball.py verbose output + fixed wrong index in loop (some i_j pair were not analyzed)
…umentation folder structure
Closed
Collaborator
Author
|
Please see updated pull request #44 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I may have found the reason behind the bug reported by David Albandea.$SU(2)$ our derivative with respect to the gauge field in in the gradient flow evolution should be multiplied by
He suggested that for
1.0/4.0(i.e. replacing2.0with1/2.0in the factor in front).This is due to the different normalization we choose for the generators of the group algebra. If we want to use the same derivative routine we use for the HMC, we need to multiply the force by
2.0*beta/N_cand also by:1.0/2.01.0/4.0(and the same forin order to get the correct results.
In the code this is implemented with an additional attribute of the hamiltonian field class: a
doubledependent by the number of colors initialized in the constructor.