Skip to content

Conversation

@frisograce
Copy link
Collaborator

Please check the following before creating the pull request (PR):

  • Did you run automatic tests?
  • Did you run manual tests?
  • Is the code provided in the PR still backwards compatible to previous SIMPA versions?

List any specific code review questions
I currently really like the way the example looks, but if there are any suggestions I'm all ears :)
Is there a reason why so many of the doc files have been updated? I have changed very few files.

List any special testing requirements
Please ensure this works on all different machines (especially checking on windows could be a good idea).

Provide issue / feature request fixed by this PR

Fixes #380

@frisograce frisograce requested a review from kdreher August 13, 2024 15:58
@frisograce frisograce self-assigned this Aug 13, 2024
@frisograce frisograce linked an issue Aug 14, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@frisograce
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have just written a brief protocol describing how we did took the scans and how i then processed the data. Please could people let me know if anything needs to be more detailed, requires reformatting or any other detail should be added (eg how should I credit the scans?)

@frisograce frisograce added the feature New feature or request label Aug 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

default beef ultrasound heterogeneities

2 participants