Rewrite: Implement GrandSlam (GSA) authentication#105
Draft
JJTech0130 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Draft
Rewrite: Implement GrandSlam (GSA) authentication#105JJTech0130 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
JJTech0130 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is aiming to introduce a very flexible API for authenticating with GrandSlam.
Specifically, it is aimed at use cases for:
It should support multiple Anisette backends, including:
Complex Anisette implementations like Jelly should live in a separate repository, and might not be available right away.
Should the optional dependencies for Anisette have a naming convention? Like [anisette-aoskit], [anisette-jelly]? Or simply name their largest dependency like [objc], [jelly]?