add blog on how to use starlark in Woodpecker CI #164
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
3 times, most recently
from
8f944e1 to
efe3848
Compare
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
7 times, most recently
from
d25b490 to
e5c8725
Compare
prashant-gurung899
requested review from
Ashim-Stha,
PrajwolAmatya,
Salipa-Gurung,
anon-pradip,
individual-it,
kavitagautam,
nabim777,
nirajacharya2,
phil-davis and
saw-jan
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
from
e5c8725 to
1a66dea
Compare
anon-pradip
reviewed
Aug 29, 2025
anon-pradip
reviewed
Aug 29, 2025
individual-it
requested changes
Sep 1, 2025
Member
individual-it
left a comment
individual-it
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there is a bunch of yaml configuration in the blog and I guess that are docker-compose snippets, but it does not say so anywhere
Ashim-Stha
reviewed
Sep 1, 2025
Ashim-Stha
reviewed
Sep 1, 2025
kavitagautam
reviewed
Sep 1, 2025
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
2 times, most recently
from
cbd5100 to
a12e238
Compare
individual-it
requested changes
Sep 3, 2025
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
5 times, most recently
from
c796745 to
a07b5b9
Compare
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
from
a07b5b9 to
a407b28
Compare
individual-it
requested changes
Sep 10, 2025
Member
individual-it
left a comment
individual-it
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just some nitpicking, the rest looks really good to me
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
from
a407b28 to
56466a8
Compare
individual-it
previously approved these changes
Sep 10, 2025
prashant-gurung899
dismissed stale reviews from anon-pradip and individual-it
via
9efb74c
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
from
56466a8 to
9efb74c
Compare
anon-pradip
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2025
Signed-off-by: prashant-gurung899 <prasantgrg777@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: prashant-gurung899 <prasantgrg777@gmail.com>
prashant-gurung899
force-pushed
the
woodpecker-ci-starlark
branch
from
9efb74c to
503b282
Compare
individual-it
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces a new blog post showcasing how to integrate the Woodpecker CI Config Service WCCS
developed by OpenClouders with the Woodpecker CI Server. The integration allows developers to seamlessly convert pipelines written in Starlark into the standard YAML format used by Woodpecker CI.
The blog contains: