Skip to content

Conversation

giordano
Copy link
Member

This makes sure we can reliably work around an issue in Pkg.

@giordano giordano force-pushed the mg/test-get-addable-spec branch from 638b071 to 27759f6 Compare January 21, 2022 14:54
@giordano
Copy link
Member Author

Uhm, nope:

Setup: Error During Test at /home/runner/work/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/test/dependencies.jl:145
  Test threw exception
  Expression: setup_dependencies(prefix, getpkg.(dependencies), platform) isa Vector{String}
  expected package `LibOSXUnwind_jll [a83860b7]` to exist at path `/home/runner/.julia/packages/LibOSXUnwind_jll/avPRF`
  Stacktrace:
    [1] pkgerror(msg::String)
      @ Pkg.Types /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Types.jl:67
    [2] collect_fixed!(env::Pkg.Types.EnvCache, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, names::Dict{UUID, String})
      @ Pkg.Operations /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Operations.jl:266
    [3] resolve_versions!(env::Pkg.Types.EnvCache, registries::Vector{Pkg.Registry.RegistryInstance}, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, julia_version::VersionNumber)
      @ Pkg.Operations /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Operations.jl:317
    [4] targeted_resolve(env::Pkg.Types.EnvCache, registries::Vector{Pkg.Registry.RegistryInstance}, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, preserve::Pkg.Types.PreserveLevel, julia_version::VersionNumber)
      @ Pkg.Operations /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Operations.jl:1197
    [5] tiered_resolve(env::Pkg.Types.EnvCache, registries::Vector{Pkg.Registry.RegistryInstance}, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, julia_version::VersionNumber)
      @ Pkg.Operations /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Operations.jl:1168
    [6] _resolve(io::Base.DevNull, env::Pkg.Types.EnvCache, registries::Vector{Pkg.Registry.RegistryInstance}, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, preserve::Pkg.Types.PreserveLevel, julia_version::VersionNumber)
      @ Pkg.Operations /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Operations.jl:1203
    [7] add(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, new_git::Set{UUID}; preserve::Pkg.Types.PreserveLevel, platform::Platform)
      @ Pkg.Operations /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/Operations.jl:1219
    [8] add(ctx::Pkg.Types.Context, pkgs::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}; preserve::Pkg.Types.PreserveLevel, platform::Platform, kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Base.DevNull, Tuple{Symbol}, NamedTuple{(:io,), Tuple{Base.DevNull}}})
      @ Pkg.API /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/API.jl:275
    [9] (::BinaryBuilderBase.var"#88#94"{Bool, Prefix, Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, Platform, Vector{String}, Vector{String}})()
      @ BinaryBuilderBase ~/work/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/src/Prefix.jl:572
   [10] activate(f::BinaryBuilderBase.var"#88#94"{Bool, Prefix, Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, Platform, Vector{String}, Vector{String}}, new_project::String)
      @ Pkg.API /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Pkg/src/API.jl:1678
   [11] setup_dependencies(prefix::Prefix, dependencies::Vector{Pkg.Types.PackageSpec}, platform::Platform; verbose::Bool)
      @ BinaryBuilderBase ~/work/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/src/Prefix.jl:565
   [12] setup_dependencies
      @ ~/work/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/src/Prefix.jl:539 [inlined]
   [13] macro expansion
      @ /opt/hostedtoolcache/julia/nightly/x64/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Test/src/Test.jl:463 [inlined]
   [14] (::var"#37#54")(dir::String)
      @ Main ~/work/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/test/dependencies.jl:145

@giordano giordano force-pushed the mg/test-get-addable-spec branch from 27759f6 to f639bfa Compare January 23, 2022 17:48
This makes sure we can reliably work around an issue in Pkg.
@giordano giordano force-pushed the mg/test-get-addable-spec branch from f639bfa to 184dfa3 Compare January 23, 2022 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant