feat added url parser

[Simplyauf]

📝 Pull Request Title

🛠️ Issue

• Closes #add-your-issue-ID

📖 Description

Please provide a general description of your changes. Include any relevant background information or context that may help reviewers understand the purpose of this PR.

🖼️ Screenshots (if applicable)

• Include any relevant screenshots or examples of the changes made. This helps reviewers visualize the updates

📝 Additional Notes

• Any additional context, questions, or considerations for the reviewers:

[coxmars]

@Simplyauf The current code has significant limitations as it only returns static values.

1. Implement helper functions for string manipulation, you can see our string lib in case we have some useful functions:

   • A function to convert felt252 to a collection (array) of characters
   • Functions to search for subsequences within a string
   • Functions to extract substrings

2. Revise the parsing approach:

   • Analyze the URL to identify standard delimiters (://, /, ?, #)
   • Implement logic that actually processes the input and extracts each component
   • Handle cases where some components might be missing

3. Include unit tests with different URL formats to verify that each function correctly extracts its component

The current code is a basic skeleton, but it needs an implementation that actually processes the provided input rather than returning hardcoded values.

[Simplyauf]

@Simplyauf The current code has significant limitations as it only returns static values.

1. Implement helper functions for string manipulation, you can see our string lib in case we have some useful functions:

   • A function to convert felt252 to a collection (array) of characters
   • Functions to search for subsequences within a string
   • Functions to extract substrings

2. Revise the parsing approach:

   • Analyze the URL to identify standard delimiters (://, /, ?, #)
   • Implement logic that actually processes the input and extracts each component
   • Handle cases where some components might be missing

3. Include unit tests with different URL formats to verify that each function correctly extracts its component

The current code is a basic skeleton, but it needs an implementation that actually processes the provided input rather than returning hardcoded values.

is it better now kindly check

[coxmars]

Hi @Simplyauf please apply those changes and we can merge

[Simplyauf]

added