Linux software raid (fd partition) support #37
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
Great work! I feel though that this would fit better into one of the sub-libraries. For example, it could go into |
Author
|
Ha, yeah it was clearly modeled much off the LVM implementation I will stick it in there. |
Only reading from Raid1
mitchcapper
force-pushed
the
linux_software_raid_support_pr
branch
from
c7c5244 to
5886369
Compare
Author
|
Done |
Owner
|
I added some minor changes, such as detection of Linux RAID independent of BIOS or GPT partition types. Also, added a test case with a test image with a mirror between two partitions. Thanks again for your contribution! Really appreciated! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only reading from Raid1
This should support all linux raid versions from 0.9 to the current 1.2. 0.9 technically probably works without this due to the logical volume starting at block 0, but for anything else this makes it work.
Let me know if this should go into a new project rather than core, also I just left the copyright from most of the others on it.