fix:修复pipeline版本为v5，修复每日探索开启加成识别错误

[21dczhang]

Summary by Sourcery

引入迁移脚本并更新流水线资源，使流水线 JSON 定义与基于 v5.x JumpBack 的格式保持一致。

新功能：

• 新增 migrate_pipeline_v5.py 工具，用于将旧版流水线 JSON 中的 is_sub/interrupt 字段转换为 v5.1 [JumpBack] 前缀格式，同时保留注释、顺序和缩进。

问题修复：

• 调整多处流水线 JSON 定义，以便在 v5 流水线格式下，日常探索增益/奖励的识别能够正常工作。

改进优化：

• 统一标准化各文件中的流水线 JSON 节点引用（next/on_error），以便通过全局收集的 is_sub 节点支持跨文件的 JumpBack 行为。

Original summary in English

Summary by Sourcery

Introduce a migration script and updated pipeline resources to align pipeline JSON definitions with the v5.x JumpBack-based format.

New Features:

• Add a migrate_pipeline_v5.py tool to convert legacy pipeline JSON is_sub/interrupt fields into the v5.1 [JumpBack] prefix format while preserving comments, ordering, and indentation.

Bug Fixes:

• Adjust multiple pipeline JSON definitions so that daily exploration buff/bonus recognition works correctly under the v5 pipeline format.

Enhancements:

• Standardize pipeline JSON node references (next/on_error) across files to support cross-file JumpBack behavior using globally collected is_sub nodes.

[sourcery-ai]

嗨——我在这里给出了一些高层次的反馈：

• 在 main() 中使用 Path.is_relative_to 会将兼容性限制在 Python 3.9 及以上；如果你需要支持更早版本的 Python，可以改为使用基于 relative_to 的 try/except，或者手动进行前缀检查来替代。
• 基于正则的 rebuild_json_with_comments 逻辑相当复杂，并且在 JSON 结构演变时（例如有嵌套对象或重复键名）可能会比较脆弱；建议将这个函数单独抽离出来，并使用各种边界情况的 JSONC 示例对其进行单元测试，以确保在引入新的字段或格式时仍能按预期工作。

给 AI Agent 的提示

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In `main()`, the use of `Path.is_relative_to` limits compatibility to Python 3.9+; if you need to support older Python versions, replace it with a try/except using `relative_to` or manual prefix checking.
- The regex-based `rebuild_json_with_comments` logic is quite complex and may be brittle when JSON shape evolves (e.g., nested objects or repeated key names); consider isolating and unit-testing this function with a variety of edge-case JSONC samples to ensure it behaves as expected when new fields or formats are introduced.

---

Sourcery 对开源项目是免费的——如果你觉得我们的评审有帮助，欢迎分享给更多人 ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{帮我变得更有用！请在每条评论上点 👍 或 👎，我会根据你的反馈改进后续的评审。}

Original comment in English

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

• In main(), the use of Path.is_relative_to limits compatibility to Python 3.9+; if you need to support older Python versions, replace it with a try/except using relative_to or manual prefix checking.
• The regex-based rebuild_json_with_comments logic is quite complex and may be brittle when JSON shape evolves (e.g., nested objects or repeated key names); consider isolating and unit-testing this function with a variety of edge-case JSONC samples to ensure it behaves as expected when new fields or formats are introduced.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In `main()`, the use of `Path.is_relative_to` limits compatibility to Python 3.9+; if you need to support older Python versions, replace it with a try/except using `relative_to` or manual prefix checking.
- The regex-based `rebuild_json_with_comments` logic is quite complex and may be brittle when JSON shape evolves (e.g., nested objects or repeated key names); consider isolating and unit-testing this function with a variety of edge-case JSONC samples to ensure it behaves as expected when new fields or formats are introduced.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}