[WIP] Use an explicit Result type instead of exceptions for data errors #88
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm starting to look into shared libraries and these tend not to get on well with exceptions. In particular, throwing an exception across a shared library boundary can lead to issues.
As it happens, most of the scenarios where I use exceptions are not "exceptional", just bad data. Consequently, it's quite reasonable to handle errors explicitly rather than implicitly in these cases. (Note that I'm not ideological either way about exceptions. It's the practical problem that primarily motivates this change.)
I've improved the Result type (defined in terms of std::expected) and I'm shifting the APIs to use that instead.
I've upgraded the C++ standard to C++23, because it introduced std::expected.