Skip to content

Conversation

@valeriupredoi
Copy link
Collaborator

@valeriupredoi valeriupredoi commented Jan 7, 2026

Description

Closes #172

An excellent call from @Zeitsperre about our deps. This change is sticking to norms, and does keep the core deps to just Python and Numpy for the conda package.

Before you get started

Checklist

  • This pull request has a descriptive title and labels
  • This pull request has a minimal description (most was discussed in the issue, but a two-liner description is still desirable)
  • Any changed dependencies have been added or removed correctly (if need be)
  • All tests pass

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.83%. Comparing base (628f227) to head (fbc9401).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #174   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.83%   76.83%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        2936     2936           
  Branches      467      467           
=======================================
  Hits         2256     2256           
  Misses        558      558           
  Partials      122      122           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[JOSS REVIEW] Synchronize development dependencies

2 participants