Update pypi publishing #376
Draft
+175
−49
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
Hey @f-hafner , The template is using copier now. Will you have time to update and complete this PR? |
|
@fdiblen , I have to get familiar with the new template but I can work on this |
I think it makes more sense to close this pull request and create a new one. I will close this PR. Please let us know if you need help with creating a new one. |
|
Was it really necessary to close this? It seemed like the merge conflicts were minor, especially because one file is completely new. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This proposes a fix to #372.
I just now realise #373 asks for a workflow. I had also wondered whether I should add that. For now, it's just in the sample code in the
README.dev.mdfile. I can transfer this into a workflow file -- can you give some feedback on the sample code? I copied from a workflow that works, but perhaps you have suggestions for improvement.