Alloc + no_std: part 2#647
Open
soywod wants to merge 2 commits intoNLnetLabs:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This part 2 is a bit bigger, but changes are small and still reviewable in my opinion. I can split if you want.
serdeto enablestd, and in a more generic way made sure thatserdeandstdare 2 separated thingsoctseqto0.6.1to benefit from Fix no_std and alloc. octseq#68stdgates byallocones, when applicablecoreandallocinstead ofstd, when applicablesrc/base/header.rswherestdgate was used instead ofrandI mention that Claude Code helped me to find references and test. I reviewed every single line.
Refs: #572 #641 NLnetLabs/octseq#68