Improve GW forecast timing of high-resolution runs with findings from containerized GW

[weihuang-jedi]

Description

While working on containerized GW, we have found that some network settings will significantly/dramatically improve GW forecast timing at high-resolution. Want to apply those changes to GW before the container code is reviewed.

Resolves #4122

Type of change

• Bug fix (fixes something broken)
• [ x] New feature (adds functionality)
• Maintenance (code refactor, clean-up, new CI test, etc.)

Change characteristics

• Is this a breaking change (a change in existing functionality)? NO
• Does this change require a documentation update? NO
• Does this change require an update to any of the following submodules? NO (If YES, please add a link to any PRs that are pending.)
  • EMC verif-global
  • GDAS
  • GFS-utils
  • GSI
  • GSI-monitor
  • GSI-utils
  • UFS-utils
  • UFS-weather-model
  • wxflow

How has this been tested?

• C48_S2SW, and C768_S2SW test on Ursa and GaeaC6

Checklist

• Any dependent changes have been merged and published
• [ x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• [ x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have documented my code, including function, input, and output descriptions
• [x ] My changes generate no new warnings
• New and existing tests pass with my changes
• This change is covered by an existing CI test or a new one has been added
• Any new scripts have been added to the .github/CODEOWNERS file with owners
• I have made corresponding changes to the system documentation if necessary

[aerorahul]

Looks ok.
Only thing to test/check here is if these blocks also improve runtime of the GSI, JEDI executables.

[JessicaMeixner-NOAA]

@weihuang-jedi - what is your definition of high resolution in this case?

[weihuang-jedi]

I have not run GSI, JEDI before, and from the the tests I did, it improves performance of high-resolution.
Hope someone at GSI, and JEDI group can do some tests with their high-resolution cases.

[JessicaMeixner-NOAA]

While not a clean test because the two runs used different spack-stacks, but using the updates suggested here, the same configuration of C1152 S2SW forecast went from 11433.912819 to 4086.673683 seconds. Thank you @weihuang-jedi !! This is awesome!

[weihuang-jedi]

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA Thank you very much for testing it out, and glad to see the similar runtime improvement.