Draft
Conversation
Contributor
|
@uramirez8707 - for this update, is each group reading the full dataset or only the relevant portions for the cores in the group? You mention you tested a 1 month run, what is the frequency of the data being ingested? If it is monthly, we may have ingested the needed timepoints on first touch or use of the data. |
Contributor
Author
|
@bensonr each group is reading the full dataset |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes # (issue)
How Has This Been Tested?
ESM4.2 with 1728x2a, 1 month
Interpolator is used for ~97 files, data is read in the main loop
Checklist:
make distcheckpasses