-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
Implement OpenMP offload for do group update #1782
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
edoyango
wants to merge
14
commits into
NOAA-GFDL:main
Choose a base branch
from
edoyango:ompoffload
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
19fedef
add gpu2gpu mpi transer with flag for do_group_update
edoyango f81247b
add missing collapse(3) clauses
edoyango 9f068e3
Use __NVCOMPILER macro for target regions
edoyango 93d148e
add back old omp directive wrapped in #ifndef __NVCOMPILER
edoyango 3e3da6e
port remaining un/pack loops
edoyango d5739ef
add multi gpu support (#2)
JorgeG94 b287471
sub __NVCOMPILER with __NVCOMPILER_OPENMP_GPU
edoyango 0cc2a77
allow choice of gpu or cpu parallel
edoyango d26eb4d
fix omp set device call
edoyango ca753a4
Revert "allow choice of gpu or cpu parallel"
edoyango 2d2cc1a
OMP MPI: Minor cleanups
marshallward fe5ddda
OMP target MPI: line length compliance
marshallward c91024a
OMP MPI: Update nocomm interface
marshallward b4fae8d
use openmp cpu if ompoffload=.false.
edoyango File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How are these two implementations equivalent? Is new idx = old pos always?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, they're equivalent. For any iteration,
idx = pos + (k-1)*nj*ni + (j-js)*ni + (i-is) + 1produces the same value thatposwould have had at that point. The formula accounts for all the iterations that would have occurred in the nested loops up to that (i,j,k) position.The reason for the change is that each nested iteration is now independent and can be performed in parallel.