[25.05] nix-tree: 0.6.1 -> 0.6.3

[wamserma]

selective manual backport of version bump

hand picked new version/hash from haskell package update in #413046

Things done

• Built on platform:
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS tests in nixos/tests.
  • Package tests at passthru.tests.
  • Tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test for functions and "core" functionality.
• Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
• Nixpkgs Release Notes
  • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
• NixOS Release Notes
  • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
  • Module update: when the change is significant.
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and others READMEs.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[github-actions]

This report is automatically generated by the PR / Check / cherry-pick CI workflow.

Some of the commits in this PR require the author's and reviewer's attention.

Please follow the backporting guidelines and cherry-pick with the -x flag.
This requires changes to the unstable master and staging branches first, before backporting them.

Occasionally, it is not possible to cherry-pick exactly the same patch.
This most frequently happens when resolving merge conflicts or when updating minor versions of packages which have already advanced to the next major on unstable.
If you need to merge this PR despite the warnings, please dismiss this review shortly before merging.

Warning

Couldn't locate original commit hash in message of 9c836aefe36cb6a63df69da7e3d0f5f29c0dd8a8.

Hint: The full diffs are also available in the runner logs with slightly better highlighting.

[utdemir]

I appreciate your work - and sorry for being late to release which caused all these!

However - I'm not involved with nixpkgs Haskell Team, so I do not know about their view of updating (auto-generated) hackage-packages.nix by hand. So I'm unable to approve/reject the PR.

[wamserma]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 426475

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• nix-tree

[sternenseemann]

Please use https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-25.05/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/replacements-by-name/README.md, see e.g. #364210. You can easily generate the necessary package expression using cabal2nix.

[sternenseemann]

#426475 (comment)

Haskell backports can't be facilitated by cherry-picking commits from master.

[github-actions]

This report is automatically generated by the PR / Check / cherry-pick CI workflow.

Some of the commits in this PR require the author's and reviewer's attention.

Please follow the backporting guidelines and cherry-pick with the -x flag.
This requires changes to the unstable master and staging branches first, before backporting them.

Occasionally, it is not possible to cherry-pick exactly the same patch.
This most frequently happens when resolving merge conflicts or when updating minor versions of packages which have already advanced to the next major on unstable.
If you need to merge this PR despite the warnings, please dismiss this review shortly before merging.

Warning

Couldn't locate original commit hash in message of 20fbdc60e0c04345788ca24b739ea6a9f4a5822f.

Hint: The full diffs are also available in the runner logs with slightly better highlighting.

Haskell updates can't be cherry-picked individually.

[sternenseemann]

The commit message shouldn't have the [Backport …] prefix. Other than that LGTM.

[github-actions]

This report is automatically generated by the PR / Check / cherry-pick CI workflow.

Some of the commits in this PR require the author's and reviewer's attention.

Please follow the backporting guidelines and cherry-pick with the -x flag.
This requires changes to the unstable master and staging branches first, before backporting them.

Occasionally, it is not possible to cherry-pick exactly the same patch.
This most frequently happens when resolving merge conflicts or when updating minor versions of packages which have already advanced to the next major on unstable.
If you need to merge this PR despite the warnings, please dismiss this review shortly before merging.

Warning

Couldn't locate original commit hash in message of 4e91eee.

Hint: The full diffs are also available in the runner logs with slightly better highlighting.

[wamserma]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 426475

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• nix-tree

[sternenseemann]

I meant that there shouldn't be a prefix in brackets at all. Commit message format guideline is the same for all branches.

[wamserma]

I meant that there shouldn't be a prefix in brackets at all. Commit message format guideline is the same for all branches.

Oh my. Sorry for keeping you busy with this. Should be fine now.

See above.

[wolfgangwalther]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 426475
Commit: 4e91eee2a8f32335cc04c4c0211b40b96b1083e4

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 3 packages built:

• haskellPackages.nix-tree
• haskellPackages.nix-tree.doc
• nix-tree

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 3 packages built:

• haskellPackages.nix-tree
• haskellPackages.nix-tree.doc
• nix-tree

---

x86_64-darwin

✅ 3 packages built:

• haskellPackages.nix-tree
• haskellPackages.nix-tree.doc
• nix-tree

---

aarch64-darwin

✅ 3 packages built:

• haskellPackages.nix-tree
• haskellPackages.nix-tree.doc
• nix-tree

[wolfgangwalther]

@sternenseemann to avoid so many repeated reviews requesting changes by CI, you can dismiss the review shortly before merge. When a not-dismissed-yet review is still there, this will only be updated and a new one will not be created.