Skip to content

Conversation

valerii15298
Copy link

  • schema changes are included in this pull request
  • schema changes are needed for this pull request but not done yet
  • no schema changes are needed for this pull request

This PR updates link to the new one.
Screenshot 2025-09-24 at 11 58 34 AM

I noticed that in 3.2 spec there is a lot of references to 3.1, more than 20 cases. Shouldn't be they replaced to be 3.2 ?

@valerii15298 valerii15298 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2025 09:00
Copy link
Contributor

@ralfhandl ralfhandl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@valerii15298 Thanks for finding and reporting this!

As explained in https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md, the published specification files in the main branch are "frozen".

Please open a pull request against the v3.2-dev branch with proposed changes to file src/oas.md.

The proposed new text should not contain a concrete date in the dialect URI and rather use a placeholder YYYY-MM-DD because schema files are published independently of the spec patch releases.

Thanks in advance!

@valerii15298
Copy link
Author

@ralfhandl and what about other places in the 3.2 spec where 3.1 is used? Should it be changed to 3.2 also?

As I mentioned in many places 3.1 is used as example version, etc

@ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor

ralfhandl commented Sep 24, 2025

3.1 as an example version in section 2.1 Versions and Depreciation is ok.

The only problematic place I found is in 4.14.7 Considerations for File Uploads:

In contrast to OAS 3.0, the format keyword has no effect on the content-encoding of the schema in OAS 3.1.

That should become "in OAS 3.1 and later".

If you find other places problematic, please point to them.

Thanks in advance!

@handrews
Copy link
Member

That should become "in OAS 3.1 and later"

I could have sworn I fixed that... might have gotten lost in the switch to the new branching system 🤦

@valerii15298
Copy link
Author

Created new PR #4994

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants