Open
Conversation
- I had to introduce an additional axiom:
Axiom Rtotal_order_T : forall r1 r2:R, {r1 < r2} + {r1 = r2} + {r1 > r2}.
gstew5
requested review from
bagnalla and
david-masters
and removed request for
bagnalla
Contributor
Author
|
@neewamp I noticed you(?) introduced a few admits in dyadics.v. Can you fill them in this branch? |
Contributor
|
I will get working on those admits. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had to introduce an additional axiom:
Axiom Rtotal_order_T : forall r1 r2:R, {r1 < r2} + {r1 = r2} + {r1 > r2}.
which was removed from Coq's Reals library (it was present at least in 8.9).
The axiom isn't true constructively but is classically.