Skip to content

兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致.支持国密#260

Closed
springrain wants to merge 12 commits intoOpenAtomFoundation:masterfrom
springrain:master
Closed

兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致.支持国密#260
springrain wants to merge 12 commits intoOpenAtomFoundation:masterfrom
springrain:master

Conversation

@springrain
Copy link
Contributor

@springrain springrain commented Oct 9, 2021

Description

What is the purpose of the change?
兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port";
因为@CodeCmn的账号存在问题,代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Brief of your solution

兼容容器环境, 监听的"127.0.0.1:47101" 存在问题, 修改为监听 ": 47101"
@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致

How Has This Been Tested?

兼容容器环境, 监听的"127.0.0.1:47101" 存在问题, 修改为监听 ": 47101"
@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致

@springrain springrain changed the title Compatible container runtime, listening ":port" 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链事务的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一样 Oct 28, 2021
@springrain springrain changed the title 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链事务的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一样 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链事务的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致 Oct 28, 2021
@springrain springrain changed the title 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链事务的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致 Oct 28, 2021
@Omkaka09
Copy link
Contributor

Omkaka09 commented Nov 2, 2021

感谢您对XuperChain的支持,我们尽快Review

@springrain springrain changed the title 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致 兼容容器环境, 监听 ":port"; 代@CodeCmn提交只读跨链的实现,和3.10版本实现的方式一致.支持国密 Nov 9, 2021
@Omkaka09 Omkaka09 requested a review from icexin November 9, 2021 14:52
@springrain
Copy link
Contributor Author

springrain commented Nov 15, 2021

根据功能拆分为三个pr, #288 #289 #230

@springrain springrain closed this Nov 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants