Skip to content

[WIP] Adds ComputeServiceID form enforcement#467

Open
dotsdl wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
compute-service-id-enforcement-2
Open

[WIP] Adds ComputeServiceID form enforcement#467
dotsdl wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
compute-service-id-enforcement-2

Conversation

@dotsdl
Copy link
Member

@dotsdl dotsdl commented Dec 10, 2025

  • Apply similar enforcement to ComputeServiceID form as in ComputeManagerID
  • Sticking to looser construction of ComputeServiceID for now
  • Black
  • Adds ComputeServiceID form enforcement

…erID

As a way to reduce the variability of ComputeServiceIDs, we propose
adopting a similar approach to how these IDs are formed as in
ComputeManagerID.
@dotsdl dotsdl changed the title Adds ComputeServiceID form enforcement [WIP] Adds ComputeServiceID form enforcement Dec 10, 2025
dotsdl added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
* Apply similar enforcement to ComputeServiceID form as in ComputeManagerID

As a way to reduce the variability of ComputeServiceIDs, we propose
adopting a similar approach to how these IDs are formed as in
ComputeManagerID.

* Sticking to looser construction of ComputeServiceID for now

* Black

* Test fixes due to ComputeManager naming convention changes

* Black

* Remove commented code from ComputeServiceID

* Black

* Allow ":" in ComputeManagerID in line with upcoming changes in #467

* Added colon to ValueError message

* Test fix from changes

* Fix to enforcement of compute_manager_id name in compute API
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant