Skip to content

Conversation

@gonzalesedwin1123
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @gonzalesedwin1123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing and reorganizing the user guide documentation. It introduces a detailed new guide for creating custom fields and consolidates existing administration-related documentation into a more structured subdirectory. The aim is to improve the clarity, accessibility, and completeness of the OpenSPP user guides, making it easier for administrators to find and utilize relevant information.

Highlights

  • New Custom Fields Guide: A comprehensive new guide has been added at docs/user_guide/administration/custom_fields.md, providing step-by-step instructions on how to create and manage custom fields within OpenSPP, including prerequisites and verification steps.
  • Documentation Reorganization: Several existing user guide documents related to administration (email gateway, indicator fields, inventory configuration) have been moved into a dedicated 'administration' subdirectory to improve logical grouping and navigation.
  • Updated Navigation and Index Files: The main user guide index (docs/user_guide/index.md) and the administration section index (docs/user_guide/administration/index.md) have been updated to reflect the new file locations and the inclusion of the new custom fields guide, ensuring all links are correct and the documentation structure is consistent.
  • Replaced Custom Fields Documentation: The previous placeholder documentation for managing custom fields (docs/user_guide/administration/managing_custom_fields.md) has been removed, superseded by the new, detailed custom fields guide.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively reorganizes the user guide by moving several administration-related documents into a dedicated administration section, which improves the logical structure of the documentation. Additionally, it introduces a new, comprehensive guide for creating custom fields, replacing a previous placeholder file. The new guide is well-structured and clear. I've added a couple of minor suggestions to further improve the clarity of some explanations in the new custom_fields.md document.

@gonzalesedwin1123
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively reorganizes the administration-related user guides and introduces a new, well-structured guide for creating custom fields. The file restructuring improves the overall organization of the documentation by grouping administrative topics together. The new custom_fields.md guide is clear and provides helpful step-by-step instructions. I have made a couple of minor suggestions to enhance clarity and consistency in the new documentation. Overall, these changes are a valuable improvement.

@gonzalesedwin1123
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively reorganizes the user guide by moving several topics into the 'Administration' section, which improves the documentation's structure. It also adds a comprehensive new guide for creating custom fields, replacing an old placeholder. The changes are logical and enhance the user guide's clarity. I have one minor suggestion for the new documentation file to improve consistency and readability.

@gonzalesedwin1123 gonzalesedwin1123 merged commit f2ea73c into refactor-structure Aug 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@gonzalesedwin1123 gonzalesedwin1123 deleted the various-fixes-in-docs-edwin branch August 29, 2025 11:46
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants