Skip to content

Conversation

@anthonymarkQA
Copy link
Contributor

removal of introduction header texts
revert overview index changes to jeremi's version

…w index

header texts fixes and revert overview index to jeremi's version
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @anthonymarkQA, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the project's documentation by standardizing the structure of user guides and ensuring the main overview index accurately reflects the intended content organization. The changes aim to enhance the clarity and consistency of the documentation for users.

Highlights

  • Documentation Cleanup: Removed the redundant "Introduction" heading from 20 user guide documentation files to streamline content and improve readability.
  • Overview Index Reversion: Reverted specific changes in the docs/overview/index.md file, restoring the previous order and status of case_studies/index and concepts/index entries, including commenting out one entry.
  • New Use Case Entry: Added a new entry, social-protection-management-information-system, to the list of use cases in docs/overview/use_cases/index.md.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@anthonymarkQA anthonymarkQA merged commit 678820a into refactor-structure Sep 1, 2025
2 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request primarily focuses on documentation cleanup by removing redundant 'Introduction' headers from numerous user guides, which improves their structure. It also reverts changes in the main overview page. The changes are generally good, but I've identified a high-severity issue in docs/overview/use_cases/index.md where a new entry points to a non-existent file, which will likely break the documentation build. I've also suggested removing a commented-out link in docs/overview/index.md to improve maintainability.

farmer_registry
social_registry
sp_mis
social-protection-management-information-system

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This new entry social-protection-management-information-system appears to be redundant. The sp_mis entry on the line above already covers the 'Social Protection Management Information System' topic. Furthermore, this new entry points to a file that doesn't seem to exist in the repository, which will likely break the documentation build. Please remove this line.

- {doc}`poc_and_pilot`

- {doc}`concepts/index`
<!-- - {doc}`case_studies/index` -->

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve maintainability and reduce clutter, it's better to remove this commented-out link to case_studies/index rather than leaving it in the file. If this page is planned to be re-introduced soon, a ticket or issue should be created to track that work.

@anthonymarkQA anthonymarkQA deleted the removal-of-introduction-from-user-guides branch September 1, 2025 01:21
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants