-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Removal of introduction from user guides and revert overview index changes #70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removal of introduction from user guides and revert overview index changes #70
Conversation
…w index header texts fixes and revert overview index to jeremi's version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @anthonymarkQA, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on refining the project's documentation by standardizing the structure of user guides and ensuring the main overview index accurately reflects the intended content organization. The changes aim to enhance the clarity and consistency of the documentation for users.
Highlights
- Documentation Cleanup: Removed the redundant "Introduction" heading from 20 user guide documentation files to streamline content and improve readability.
- Overview Index Reversion: Reverted specific changes in the
docs/overview/index.mdfile, restoring the previous order and status ofcase_studies/indexandconcepts/indexentries, including commenting out one entry. - New Use Case Entry: Added a new entry,
social-protection-management-information-system, to the list of use cases indocs/overview/use_cases/index.md.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request primarily focuses on documentation cleanup by removing redundant 'Introduction' headers from numerous user guides, which improves their structure. It also reverts changes in the main overview page. The changes are generally good, but I've identified a high-severity issue in docs/overview/use_cases/index.md where a new entry points to a non-existent file, which will likely break the documentation build. I've also suggested removing a commented-out link in docs/overview/index.md to improve maintainability.
| farmer_registry | ||
| social_registry | ||
| sp_mis | ||
| social-protection-management-information-system |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This new entry social-protection-management-information-system appears to be redundant. The sp_mis entry on the line above already covers the 'Social Protection Management Information System' topic. Furthermore, this new entry points to a file that doesn't seem to exist in the repository, which will likely break the documentation build. Please remove this line.
| - {doc}`poc_and_pilot` | ||
|
|
||
| - {doc}`concepts/index` | ||
| <!-- - {doc}`case_studies/index` --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|



removal of introduction header texts
revert overview index changes to jeremi's version