-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Document fixes #71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document fixes #71
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gonzalesedwin1123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on a comprehensive update and cleanup of several key documentation files. The changes aim to improve the accuracy and relevance of the content by removing outdated information, updating references to current tools and platforms, and enhancing the overall structure to provide clearer guidance for developers.
Highlights
- Documentation Cleanup and Modernization: Extensive removal of commented-out sections and outdated references, particularly in
contributing.md, streamlining the content and improving readability. - CI/CD Platform Update: References to TravisCI have been updated to GitHub Actions in
module_lifecycle_development_status.rst, reflecting a change in the continuous integration platform. - Enhanced Module Development Guidance: The
module_development/index.mdfile has been significantly restructured to provide a detailed, enumerated list of specific module customization guides, making it easier for developers to find relevant information. - Review Date and Local Preview URL Updates: Minor but important updates to the review date in
contributing.mdand the local documentation preview URL for consistency and accuracy.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request provides several documentation fixes, including removing commented-out sections, deleting unused labels, and updating content for consistency. The changes improve the overall quality and readability of the documentation. I have identified two minor issues: one regarding an inconsistent list of Sphinx extensions in contributing.md, and another concerning a missing newline at the end of developer_guide/module_development/index.md. Addressing these points will help ensure the documentation is both accurate and follows best practices.
|



Documents Modified: