Skip to content

Conversation

@gonzalesedwin1123
Copy link
Member

Documents Modified:

  • Module Development
  • community/module_lifecycle_development_status
  • community/module_lifecycle_maintainer_role
  • community/contributing

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @gonzalesedwin1123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a comprehensive update and cleanup of several key documentation files. The changes aim to improve the accuracy and relevance of the content by removing outdated information, updating references to current tools and platforms, and enhancing the overall structure to provide clearer guidance for developers.

Highlights

  • Documentation Cleanup and Modernization: Extensive removal of commented-out sections and outdated references, particularly in contributing.md, streamlining the content and improving readability.
  • CI/CD Platform Update: References to TravisCI have been updated to GitHub Actions in module_lifecycle_development_status.rst, reflecting a change in the continuous integration platform.
  • Enhanced Module Development Guidance: The module_development/index.md file has been significantly restructured to provide a detailed, enumerated list of specific module customization guides, making it easier for developers to find relevant information.
  • Review Date and Local Preview URL Updates: Minor but important updates to the review date in contributing.md and the local documentation preview URL for consistency and accuracy.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gonzalesedwin1123 gonzalesedwin1123 merged commit da7e9d5 into refactor-structure Sep 1, 2025
2 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request provides several documentation fixes, including removing commented-out sections, deleting unused labels, and updating content for consistency. The changes improve the overall quality and readability of the documentation. I have identified two minor issues: one regarding an inconsistent list of Sphinx extensions in contributing.md, and another concerning a missing newline at the end of developer_guide/module_development/index.md. Addressing these points will help ensure the documentation is both accurate and follows best practices.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants