Skip to content

Conversation

@reichie020212
Copy link
Member

Why is this change needed?

How was the change implemented?

New unit tests

Unit tests executed by the author

How to test manually

Related links

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 7, 2025

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.18%. Comparing base (959faea) to head (842bda0).
Report is 4 commits behind head on 17.0.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
spp_audit_post/models/spp_audit_log.py 66.66% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             17.0     #776      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.19%   76.18%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         710      710              
  Lines       18497    18498       +1     
  Branches     2271     2272       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        14094    14093       -1     
  Misses       3910     3910              
- Partials      493      495       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gonzalesedwin1123 gonzalesedwin1123 merged commit 80a56a9 into 17.0 Mar 10, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 10, 2025
@gonzalesedwin1123 gonzalesedwin1123 deleted the 64-audit-log branch March 10, 2025 06:05
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants