Fixing coverage issue

[kneckinator]

Why is this change needed?

Coverage (through CodeCov) was only taking the farmer test output into account. This change combines the MIS execution with the Farmer execution.

How was the change implemented?

By combining the output for each run into a single coverage file which is then picked up by CodeCov as usual.

New unit tests

None

Unit tests executed by the author

All

How to test manually

N/A

Related links

N/A

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.69%. Comparing base (aa7a32f) to head (3087623).
Report is 3 commits behind head on 17.0.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             17.0     #790      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.07%   75.69%   +0.62%     
==========================================
  Files         730      764      +34     
  Lines       19285    20218     +933     
  Branches     2400     2501     +101     
==========================================
+ Hits        14479    15305     +826     
- Misses       4298     4379      +81     
- Partials      508      534      +26     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.