Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 20, 2025. It is now read-only.

[Snyk] Security upgrade nx from 16.10.0 to 19.6.1#621

Open
tirumerla wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-99aded888b6bcca15bcf2fe843e689c5
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade nx from 16.10.0 to 19.6.1#621
tirumerla wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-99aded888b6bcca15bcf2fe843e689c5

Conversation

@tirumerla
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-7361793
  801  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-AXIOS-7361793
@socket-security
Copy link

Report too large to display inline

View full report↗︎

@socket-security
Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
AI warning npm/import-local@3.1.0
  • Notes: The code poses a potential security risk due to the comparison with the 'path.parse' function and the use of 'require' with dynamically constructed paths. The unnecessary whitespace and line breaks raise concerns about potential obfuscation. Further review and hardening of input validation and path manipulation logic are recommended.
  • Confidence: 1.00
  • Severity: 0.60
🚫

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is an AI-detected potential code anomaly?

AI has identified unusual behaviors that may pose a security risk.

An AI system found a low-risk anomaly in this package. It may still be fine to use, but you should check that it is safe before proceeding.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/import-local@3.1.0

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants