Added: test case for https://github.com/PaulHatch/semantic-version/is…#180
Draft
mattbryce93 wants to merge 1 commit intoPaulHatch:masterfrom
Draft
Added: test case for https://github.com/PaulHatch/semantic-version/is…#180mattbryce93 wants to merge 1 commit intoPaulHatch:masterfrom
mattbryce93 wants to merge 1 commit intoPaulHatch:masterfrom
Conversation
Author
|
Looking into the code, we get the bumps occuring when this semantic-version/src/action.ts Line 44 in 305899e
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…sues/179
Have some minor spelling mistakes also whilst checking the contributing docs.
These test cases demonstrate the issue described in #179
The test cases demonstrate the conflict of expectation when using the verion_from_branch functionality. If someone mistakenly has a matching sting in their commits, the reult from the following tests are:
I did try and figure out where this would be fixed in the source code of the action, admittedly I got a bit lost in the
DefaultLastReleaseResolver.ResolveAsyncfunction. I'm also not sure @PaulHatch what you would like to do with this, or if it is intentional. So I'll await and see what you think, admittedly you may be better at producing a patch for this, seeing as I did get a bit lost in figuring out what the fix should be.