Skip to content

Conversation

@fxjung
Copy link
Member

@fxjung fxjung commented Jun 9, 2022

SimulationSet now actually is a proper set and can do all things "setty".
Note that this requires all param values to be hashable, which also implies immutability. I don't think that this is a problem, though.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results

    1 files  ±0    1 suites  ±0   43s ⏱️ +9s
105 tests ±0  93 ✔️  - 8  4 💤 ±0  8 ❌ +8 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 2f02cb8. ± Comparison against base commit 954c9b7.

@fxjung fxjung changed the title 214 implement simset set operations WIP: 214 implement simset set operations Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants