Skip to content

chore: add CodeQL workflow#106

Merged
marandaneto merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/add-codeql-workflow
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

chore: add CodeQL workflow#106
marandaneto merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/add-codeql-workflow

Conversation

@marandaneto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

💡 Motivation and Context

Add a custom CodeQL workflow so GitHub can scan this repository's GitHub Actions configuration for security and quality issues.

💚 How did you test it?

Reviewed the generated workflow YAML against the existing CI workflows and the referenced PostHog CodeQL workflow.

📝 Checklist

  • I reviewed the submitted code.
  • I added tests to verify the changes.
  • I updated the docs if needed.
  • No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.

If releasing new changes

  • Ran sampo add to generate a changeset file
  • Added the release label to the PR

@marandaneto marandaneto requested review from a team and rafaeelaudibert as code owners April 29, 2026 08:52
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

posthog-elixir Compliance Report

Date: 2026-04-29 08:52:56 UTC
Duration: 182ms

⚠️ Some Tests Failed

0/1 tests passed, 1 failed


Feature_Flags Tests

⚠️ 0/1 tests passed, 1 failed

View Details
Test Status Duration
Request Payload.Request With Person Properties Device Id 6ms

Failures

request_payload.request_with_person_properties_device_id

404, message='Not Found', url='http://sdk-adapter:8080/get_feature_flag'

@marandaneto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

#105 PR is stuck because of CodeQL

@marandaneto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@marandaneto marandaneto requested a review from andehen April 29, 2026 08:54
@marandaneto marandaneto enabled auto-merge (squash) April 29, 2026 08:54
@marandaneto marandaneto merged commit 381bcbe into main Apr 29, 2026
24 checks passed
@marandaneto marandaneto deleted the chore/add-codeql-workflow branch April 29, 2026 09:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants