Skip to content

Conversation

@henryjonathanquispe
Copy link
Contributor

@henryjonathanquispe henryjonathanquispe commented Sep 24, 2025

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

@vladyrichter
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-71ffeb3eff.engk8s.processmaker.net

@pmPaulis pmPaulis requested review from gustavobascope and removed request for agustinbusso September 24, 2025 19:24
Copy link
Contributor

@gustavobascope gustavobascope left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

Copy link
Contributor

@gustavobascope gustavobascope left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@vladyrichter
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-71ffeb3eff.engk8s.processmaker.net

@henryjonathanquispe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pmPaulis I did some changes in the statusCell component
please review the CI

@vladyrichter
Copy link

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-71ffeb3eff.engk8s.processmaker.net

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

@ana-mauricio ana-mauricio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR is approved , the following scenarios were tested https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-26782

@pmPaulis pmPaulis added Beta3 and removed Beta1 labels Oct 18, 2025
@nolanpro nolanpro merged commit 464e2de into develop Oct 30, 2025
8 checks passed
@nolanpro nolanpro deleted the feature/FOUR-26661 branch October 30, 2025 21:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants