Skip to content

Syntax issues (paragraph 27, 48, 49) #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
kant wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Syntax issues (paragraph 27, 48, 49) #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ with no moving parts!
The current valve is described in [the paper](https://github.com/PubInv/ferrofluidcheckvalve/blob/master/doc/journal-1.2/asme2ej.pdf) in this repo that we will
submit to an open access journal soon. Like all Public Invention inventions, we do not seek patents, and you are free to use this design under the CERN Strong Reciprocal License [(CERN-OHL-S-2.0)](https://ohwr.org/cern_ohl_s_v2.txt).

The gist of the fundamental invention can be understood from the this diagram:
The gist of the fundamental invention can be understood from this diagram:
![TopViewFerrofluidModelLabelled](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5296671/143282739-8558cb70-b031-4ace-9674-54a213ffebf4.png)

Veronica Stuckey made a [nice video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGzz6LX1n6A) of her work that explains it well.
Expand All @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ As always, Public Invention invites you take this idea and run with it! Some pot
1. Can the performance of the valve be improved by shaping the chamber and/or the magnetic field better?
2. How do the pressures change if you scale it down?
3. How far can it be scaled down with a 3D printer before some sort of lithographic or etching technique is required?
4. Can you make a positive-displacement pump on a single unit by making a 3D printed pump consiting of a 2 PFCVS, a piston made out of a ferrofluid bolus, and an external electomagnet to move the piston (possibly on a PCB)?
5. This design is essentially a 2D shape slightly extrudede to be a 3D volume. Is there a fully 3D design that is similar but would have better performance?
4. Can you make a positive-displacement pump on a single unit by making a 3D printed pump consisting of a 2 PFCVS, a piston made out of a ferrofluid bolus, and an external electromagnet to move the piston (possibly on a PCB)?
5. This design is essentially a 2D shape slightly extruded to be a 3D volume. Is there a fully 3D design that is similar but would have better performance?



Expand Down