Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

@google-labs-jules google-labs-jules bot commented Oct 10, 2025

User description

This change fixes the Docker build process by refactoring the Dockerfile, adding a .dockerignore file, and removing a circular dependency in package.json.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 372084537545250861


PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement


Description

  • Refactor Dockerfile to use multi-stage build pattern

  • Add .dockerignore file to optimize build context

  • Remove circular dependency from package.json

  • Update Docker configuration for production deployment


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Old Single-stage Build"] --> B["Multi-stage Builder"]
  B --> C["Runtime Stage"]
  D["Build Context Issues"] --> E[".dockerignore Added"]
  F["Circular Dependency"] --> G["Clean package.json"]
  B --> H["Optimized Image"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
.dockerignore
Add .dockerignore for build optimization                                 

.dockerignore

  • Add comprehensive .dockerignore file
  • Exclude development files and directories
  • Optimize Docker build context size
+16/-0   
Enhancement
Dockerfile
Refactor to multi-stage Docker build                                         

Dockerfile

  • Implement multi-stage build with builder and runner stages
  • Update base image from bun:1.1.3-alpine to bun:1.2.12
  • Remove git cloning and use COPY for source code
  • Change from development to production server startup
+21/-22 
Bug fix
package.json
Remove circular dependency from dependencies                         

package.json

  • Remove circular dependency "QCX": "." entry
  • Clean up dependencies to prevent build issues
+0/-1     

This commit refactors the Docker build process to follow best practices and resolve build failures.

The key changes include:
- Rewriting the Dockerfile to use a multi-stage build, which improves caching and reduces image size.
- Adding a .dockerignore file to exclude node_modules and other unnecessary files from the build context.
- Removing a circular dependency from package.json that was causing an infinite loop during the build.
- Updating the CMD instruction to correctly start the development server and expose it to the host machine.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
qcx Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 10, 2025 5:17pm

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 10, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ ngoiyaeric
❌ google-labs-jules[bot]
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ngoiyaeric ngoiyaeric marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2025 17:16
@charliecreates charliecreates bot requested a review from CharlieHelps October 10, 2025 17:17
@qodo-merge-pro
Copy link
Contributor

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
Build reproducibility risk

Description: Excluding Dockerfile and docker-compose.yaml from the build context can hinder
reproducible builds and break docker build workflows that rely on copying the Dockerfile
or composing within context.
.dockerignore [8-10]

Referred Code
Dockerfile
docker-compose.yaml
README.md
Environment config handling

Description: Including .env and .env.local.example in .dockerignore prevents them from being copied
into images if needed, which may cause runtime misconfiguration or reliance on opaque
external secret injection; verify intended secret management.
.dockerignore [14-15]

Referred Code
.env
.env.local.example
Excess packages in image

Description: Copying node_modules from the builder stage into the runner can include devDependencies
and unnecessary build artifacts, increasing attack surface and risking production
mismatch; consider a production-only install in the runner.
Dockerfile [20-24]

Referred Code
COPY --from=builder /app/.next ./.next
COPY --from=builder /app/public ./public
COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
COPY --from=builder /app/bun.lock ./bun.lock
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
No custom compliance provided

Follow the guide to enable custom compliance check.

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-merge-pro
Copy link
Contributor

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
Possible issue
Use correct Bun lockfile name

In the Dockerfile, correct the Bun lockfile name from bun.lock to bun.lockb in
the COPY command.

Dockerfile [6-8]

 # Install dependencies (separated for better cache utilization)
-COPY package.json bun.lock ./
+COPY package.json bun.lockb ./
 RUN bun install
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the Bun lockfile is bun.lockb, not bun.lock. This fixes a critical error in the Dockerfile that would likely cause the build to fail or lead to non-deterministic dependency installation.

High
General
Install only production dependencies

To optimize the Docker image size, instead of copying the entire node_modules
directory, copy only package.json and bun.lockb to the runner stage and run bun
install --production.

Dockerfile [19-24]

 # Copy only necessary files from builder
 COPY --from=builder /app/.next ./.next
 COPY --from=builder /app/public ./public
 COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
-COPY --from=builder /app/bun.lock ./bun.lock
-COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules
+COPY --from=builder /app/bun.lockb ./bun.lockb
 
+# Install production dependencies
+RUN bun install --production
+
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

__

Why: This suggestion correctly points out that copying the entire node_modules directory from the builder stage is inefficient. Installing only production dependencies in the runner stage is a best practice that significantly reduces the final image size.

Medium
  • More

Copy link

@charliecreates charliecreates bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Dockerfile references bun.lock, but the repository uses bun.lockb, which will likely break builds; use bun.lockb and freeze installs for reproducibility. The runtime stage copies node_modules from the builder, inflating image size—prefer a production-only install or Next.js standalone output. Consider adding EXPOSE 3000, NODE_ENV=production, and running as a non-root user for better security and operability. The .dockerignore should also exclude .next and other build artifacts to prevent leaking local state into images.

Additional notes (1)
  • Maintainability | .dockerignore:1-16
    It’s easy to accidentally include local build artifacts in the image (e.g., .next from a previous local build). Excluding these improves cache efficiency and prevents polluting the builder context.
Summary of changes
  • Introduced a multi-stage Docker build using oven/bun:1.2.12 with separate builder and runner stages.
  • Optimized dependency installation by copying package.json and a lockfile prior to bun install for better caching.
  • Copied only build artifacts and selected files into the runtime image, and updated the container CMD to start the app bound to 0.0.0.0.
  • Added a new .dockerignore to exclude development files from the build context.
  • Removed the circular "QCX": "." dependency from package.json.

Comment on lines +6 to 9
# Install dependencies (separated for better cache utilization)
COPY package.json bun.lock ./
RUN bun install

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The lockfile copied/used here is bun.lock, but this repository appears to use bun.lockb (binary). This will break build caching and can fail the build if bun.lock doesn’t exist. Use bun.lockb and enable a frozen install for reproducible builds.

Suggestion

Replace the lockfile and harden installs:

# Install dependencies (separated for better cache utilization)
COPY package.json bun.lockb ./
RUN bun install --frozen-lockfile

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.

COPY --from=builder /app/public ./public
COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
COPY --from=builder /app/bun.lock ./bun.lock
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copying the entire node_modules from the builder bloats the runtime image and defeats much of the value of a multi-stage build. Prefer a production-only install in the runner (using package.json + bun.lockb) or leverage Next.js output: 'standalone' to eliminate most runtime deps.

Suggestion

Minimize runtime image size by installing only production deps in the runner:

# Runtime stage
FROM oven/bun:1.2.12 AS runner
WORKDIR /app

# Only what's needed to install runtime deps
COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
COPY --from=builder /app/bun.lockb ./bun.lockb
RUN bun install --frozen-lockfile --production

# App artifacts
COPY --from=builder /app/.next ./.next
COPY --from=builder /app/public ./public

# Optional hardening
ENV NODE_ENV=production
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["bun", "run", "start", "--", "-H", "0.0.0.0"]

Alternatively, configure Next.js with output: 'standalone' and copy the .next/standalone directory to further reduce size.

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.

Comment on lines +16 to +27
FROM oven/bun:1.2.12 AS runner
WORKDIR /app

# Copy only necessary files from builder
COPY --from=builder /app/.next ./.next
COPY --from=builder /app/public ./public
COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
COPY --from=builder /app/bun.lock ./bun.lock
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules

# Set the default command
CMD ["bun", "dev"]
# Start production server
CMD ["bun", "start", "-H", "0.0.0.0"]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider running the container as a non-root user to reduce risk in production. The Bun image typically includes a bun user; switching to it in the runner stage is a low-effort hardening step.

Suggestion

Switch to a non-root user in the runner stage:

# After copying files in runner stage, before CMD
USER bun

Reply with "@CharlieHelps yes please" if you'd like me to add a commit with this suggestion.

@charliecreates charliecreates bot removed the request for review from CharlieHelps October 10, 2025 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants