Skip to content

Conversation

@vxpyy9
Copy link

@vxpyy9 vxpyy9 commented Jan 29, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @vxpyy9, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug in the file browser plugin where the listing of slides was incorrect due to a variable name typo during JSON parsing. The fix ensures that the correct data is processed, resolving the issue with slide display.

Highlights

  • Typo Correction: Corrected a variable name in the file-browser.js plugin, ensuring that the slides variable is parsed from its own content rather than an incorrect cases variable.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug in the file browser's slide listing functionality. The original code was attempting to parse an undefined variable cases, which would lead to a runtime error. The fix correctly uses the slides variable, which holds the response text. I have included one suggestion to further improve the code's clarity and maintainability.

Comment on lines +69 to 72
slides = JSON.parse(slides);
for (const c of slides || []) {
items.push(makeSlideItem(c.local_id || c.id));
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the fix is correct, reusing the slides variable to store both the raw string response and then the parsed JSON object can be confusing. It's better practice to introduce a new constant for the parsed data to improve code clarity and maintainability. This avoids having a variable change its type, which makes the code easier to reason about.

Suggested change
slides = JSON.parse(slides);
for (const c of slides || []) {
items.push(makeSlideItem(c.local_id || c.id));
}
const parsedSlides = JSON.parse(slides);
for (const c of parsedSlides || []) {
items.push(makeSlideItem(c.local_id || c.id));
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant