Skip to content

Comments

🤖 AI Code Review Fix: The 'Key Services' section under 'System Architecture' is in...#3

Open
Nether403 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/code-review-1760465240320
Open

🤖 AI Code Review Fix: The 'Key Services' section under 'System Architecture' is in...#3
Nether403 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/code-review-1760465240320

Conversation

@Nether403
Copy link
Contributor

@Nether403 Nether403 commented Oct 14, 2025

AI-Generated Fix

Issue: The 'Key Services' section under 'System Architecture' is incomplete and ends abruptly.

Suggestion: Complete the sentence or list item to accurately describe the key services used in the project. For example: 'Complexity analysis engine'.

File: README.md
Line: 46


This pull request was automatically generated by RepoRadar's AI Code Review feature.

Please review the changes carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README to rename “Complexity analysis & scoring” to “Complexity analysis engine” under Key Services for clearer, consistent terminology.
    • Aligned wording to improve readability and reduce ambiguity; no functional impact on the product.
    • Performed minor formatting cleanup (newline at end of file) with no visible content changes.

@openhands-ai
Copy link

openhands-ai bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!

  • GitHub Actions are failing:
    • CI
    • Deno

If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like

@OpenHands please fix the failing actions on PR #3 at branch `fix/code-review-1760465240320`

Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state.

You can manage your notification settings

1 similar comment
@openhands-ai
Copy link

openhands-ai bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!

  • GitHub Actions are failing:
    • CI
    • Deno

If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like

@OpenHands please fix the failing actions on PR #3 at branch `fix/code-review-1760465240320`

Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state.

You can manage your notification settings

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The README was updated to rename a listed service from “Complexity analysis & scoring” to “Complexity analysis engine.” A newline-at-EOF formatting adjustment was made. No code or API changes occurred.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs: Service terminology refresh
README.md
Renamed the Key Services entry from “Complexity analysis & scoring” to “Complexity analysis engine”; preserved all other content. Added/normalized a trailing newline at end of file.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nudge a word, hop light and clean,
From “scoring” to an engine’s sheen—
A tidy doc, a newline too,
Carrot-commit in calmest hue.
Burrow builds on terms aligned,
Thump—release with peace of mind.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The provided title includes an emoji, a generic “AI Code Review Fix” prefix, and trails off with an ellipsis, leaving the primary change unclear. Although it mentions the Key Services section, it fails to concisely and accurately summarize what was actually done. As such, it does not provide a clear, single-sentence description of the main change. Please replace the title with a concise, complete summary of the change without emojis or ellipses. For example, “Complete Key Services section under System Architecture in README.md” clearly communicates the primary update. A clear and specific title will improve the repository history and help reviewers quickly understand the PR.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/code-review-1760465240320

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42ce40d and 0ada805.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[grammar] ~55-~55: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...Wappalyzer) - Complexity analysis engine - Business improvement generation - Export...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~239-~239: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... - 📧 Contact support for urgent matters

(QB_NEW_EN)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

55-55: Terminology update looks good.

The revised bullet now reads cleanly and completes the service description.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant