Skip to content

Conversation

@pholica pholica changed the title Selinux backports rhel 9 [rhel-9-main] Selinux test related backports Dec 9, 2025
@pholica pholica force-pushed the pholica-selinux-backports-rhel-9 branch from 5e8a24c to 7440ec4 Compare December 9, 2025 15:57
@pholica pholica requested review from pkoprda and zpetrace December 10, 2025 07:55
pkoprda
pkoprda previously approved these changes Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@pkoprda pkoprda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@zpetrace zpetrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, it seems some backports are missing as SELinux test is failing on the RHEL-9, please add the missing backports, thanks:)

Both are False, and there's no code that would distinguish between
empty string and None anyway. This makes it harder to use the
result of this function when working with it as with string.
Some tests were not prepared for SELinux testing. Mostly, they are
testing command-line/tool related functionality rather than the "service"
mode of insights-client - being invoked by system timer or by other
services such as rhccc. Those test cases need to explicitly call
insights-client as a user would do not setting SELinux context.
@pholica pholica force-pushed the pholica-selinux-backports-rhel-9 branch from a1e8981 to effff1c Compare December 10, 2025 13:06
Copy link
Contributor

@zpetrace zpetrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@zpetrace zpetrace merged commit 522b8b9 into rhel-9-main Dec 10, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@zpetrace zpetrace deleted the pholica-selinux-backports-rhel-9 branch December 10, 2025 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants