Skip to content

Conversation

@klarose
Copy link

@klarose klarose commented Aug 15, 2022

The license for open-web-start is BSD 3-clause. The third clause
essentially prohibits non-copyright-holders from using the project
'trademarks'. While it calls out only the name of the project/copyright
holders, for good measure I don't want to use any of the assets if I
package this in another binary.

This change abstracts the GUI assets so the packager is responsible for
provisioning them. This isn't the best interface, since the set of
assets is not encoded in the interface, meaning a new version could
break compatibility without the compiler catching it. But, it works well
enough. We could always extend the interface to have explicit getters in
the future if it proves problematic.

Note: I noticed that some of the assets in the generated file don't actually exist. I'm not sure if this is intentional or not. I also noticed that it was checked in despite being in .gitignore. Either way, I kept the generated file the same, excepting the package name. I didn't regenerate it.

The license for open-web-start is BSD 3-clause. The third clause
essentially prohibits non-copyright-holders from using the project
'trademarks'. While it calls out only the name of the project/copyright
holders, for good measure I don't want to use any of the assets if I
package this in another binary.

This change abstracts the GUI assets so the packager is responsible for
provisioning them. This isn't the *best* interface, since the set of
assets is not encoded in the interface, meaning a new version could
break compatibility without the compiler catching it. But, it works well
enough. We could always extend the interface to have explicit getters in
the future if it proves problematic.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant