-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
511 - anonymisation for spectroscopy data #513
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #513 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.35% 87.35%
=======================================
Files 76 76
Lines 3378 3378
=======================================
Hits 2951 2951
Misses 427 427 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
stefpiatek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just want to check that you've gone through all the tags that are in both spectroscopy example studies? Surprising that there's only two extra tags on top of MRI at least at first glance
…/mr-spectroscopy.yaml Co-authored-by: Stef Piatek <s.piatek@ucl.ac.uk>
…_MR/1.dcm` which might be or not included (also needs to be formated). Do we need to include all tags with a config format?
|
Just added dff1b18 with some ~20% of unformatted tags from |
We're not yet keeping nested tags except for those that cause validation errors
p-j-smith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've updated the mr-spectroscopy config file with tags that cause the validation to fail, and I've not yet included all nested tags except for those that are required by the validator
projects/configs/tag-operations/manufacturer-overrides/mr-spectroscopy.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
stefpiatek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let me know when you want a review but adding in a quick comment
We're running into this issue in 0.6.3: pydicom/dicom-validator#123
stefpiatek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for getting this in, if you wanted to test this you create a temporary config using pixl__default__tag.yaml or whatever the placeholder value is when we add the pixl project tag to the instance on reciept. THen could upload some spectroscopy files manually into orthanc raw and that'll move it along to orthanc anon for anonymisation
ah that's a good idea, thanks! |
…ri.yaml Also replace the tags rather than keep
Description
Fixes #511
Adds config files for mr-spectroscopy, including tags
RF Echo Train Length AttributeandMR Timing and Related Parameters Sequence Attributethat James Moggridge mentioned is fine to keep them.Type of change
Please delete options accordingly to the description.
Suggested Checklist
mainbranch.UCLH-Foundtry/arc-devsquash and merge