Add original PDS4 reviews for Cassini ISS and VIMS to Reviews page#261
Add original PDS4 reviews for Cassini ISS and VIMS to Reviews page#261matthewtiscareno wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds documentation for PDS4 Cassini ISS/VIMS peer reviews, including extensive technical notes on bundle identifiers, LID references, and corrections. Incorporates reviewer email threads and notes documenting validation issues and context references. Creates new HTML pages presenting the peer review process, instructions, and outcomes, and updates the main reviews index to link the new Cassini review page. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Branch deployed to staging: http://staging.pds.seti.org/pull_requests/261 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/NOTES.txt(1 hunks)website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-chen-2019-10-11.txt(1 hunks)website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-spitale-2019-12-13.txt(1 hunks)website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-waldron-2019-10-10.txt(1 hunks)website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/index.html(1 hunks)website/reviews/index.html(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-chen-2019-10-11.txt
[style] ~27-~27: Consider adding a conjunction to make this sound more formal.
Context: ...ugh to have the same meaning so I’m not sure these are crucial. I barely remember any men...
(NOT_SURE_IT_WORKS)
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-waldron-2019-10-10.txt
[style] ~16-~16: Consider adding a conjunction to make this sound more formal.
Context: ...ugh to have the same meaning so I’m not sure these are crucial. · This warning came...
(NOT_SURE_IT_WORKS)
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...ini Orbiter Imaging Science Subsystem - Wide Angle Camera' Expected one of: '[IMAGING SCIE...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~25-~25: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...'' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'mission_phase_n...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
[style] ~27-~27: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...2 - Earth Cruise', 'Venus 2 Encounter'. o ERROR [error.label.schema] line 140, ...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~28-~28: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...'' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'observation_id'...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
[style] ~28-~28: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...inLength '1' for type 'observation_id'. o ERROR [error.label.schema] line 140, ...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~32-~32: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...'' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'observation_id'...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/NOTES.txt
[style] ~519-~519: Nowadays, it’s more common to write this as one word.
Context: ...00_1100.xsd Please use the one from the web site. Same for the .sch. The .xml wasn't inc...
(RECOMMENDED_COMPOUNDS)
[style] ~527-~527: Consider a more concise word here.
Context: ... with no consequence for ignoring, that in order to create a fully self-describing bundle, ...
(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-spitale-2019-12-13.txt
[locale-violation] ~1-~1: In American English, “take a look” is more commonly used.
Context: Hi Mike and Mitch, I have had a look at the data throughout the week and I h...
(HAVE_A_LOOK)
[grammar] ~1-~1: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...latively quickly. Note that I used the vicar headers and did not evaluate the xml he...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-spitale-2019-12-13.txt (1)
1-3: Documentation artifact: review note is complete.The peer review note documents data inspection activities across the Cassini ISS bundles and is appropriately structured. The content is suitable for archival as-is.
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/index.html (3)
30-30: Verify external validation logs link is reachable.Line 30 links to "/review-data/coiss-covims-peer-reviews" for validator logs. Confirm this directory path exists and is accessible on the deployment target.
1-52: Approve page structure; external bundle links should be verified for correctness.The HTML structure is well-formed and appropriate for a peer review documentation page. The four bundle links (lines 18-21) reference external PDS4 data products; verify these URLs are accurate and remain accessible.
40-44: All review document links are resolvable.Verified that all four referenced review files exist in the directory: coiss-review-waldron-2019-10-10.txt, coiss-review-spitale-2019-12-13.txt, NOTES.txt, and coiss-review-chen-2019-10-11.txt.
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-waldron-2019-10-10.txt (1)
1-43: Documentation artifact: peer review email is appropriately archived.This email documents substantive validation findings (context product errors, reference mismatches, label validation issues) and is suitable for preservation as a peer review record. The static analysis flags (grammar/style) appear in error messages and technical descriptions and do not require correction.
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/coiss-review-chen-2019-10-11.txt (1)
1-35: Documentation artifact: technical review discussion is appropriately preserved.This email documents the context product naming, LID formation, and validation considerations discussed by the Engineering Node representative. The content provides valuable supplementary perspective on the peer review findings and is suitable for archival.
website/reviews/coiss-covims-peer-reviews/NOTES.txt (1)
1-527: Documentation artifact: comprehensive technical guidance is well-organized and complete.This file provides extensive, structured guidance on PDS4 bundle corrections across all four Cassini bundles (ISS cruise/Saturn, VIMS cruise/Saturn). The notes are organized hierarchically by file/location and include specific recommendations for LID corrections, schema conformance, and collection alignment. This is valuable supplementary documentation for implementing the peer review findings.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit