Conversation
Also changed the file to show relative error instead whatever wa sthere before
uncommented TIMING definition, for plots. Add modified test_manger that can handle any dimensions
…rtion to avoid segfault in case of multiple processes per group
…th minimal number of hierarchizations and dehierarchizations
| static MPI_Request *requestAsync; | ||
|
|
||
| /** SubspaceSized for Async Reduce*/ | ||
| static std::vector<int> *subspaceSizes; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel like this should not be a static member of Task because it already exists in DistributedSparseGridUniform, and I think that this is where it should be.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As far as I know this is in task because the Sparse Grid gets destroyed frequently but this information should be constant over multiple combinations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But this is just an optimization so that the sparse grid sizes do not need to be communicated again. For the request array I would need to investigate if it is necessary to be in task.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But one could also put the subspaceSizes as static member of the SparseGrid class I think...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, you are right, we can leave it like this here. on third-level, subspacesDataSizes_ is introduced which makes this redundant. I had not noticed that it wasn't on master.
|
I am just investigating a merge into https://github.com/SGpp/DisCoTec/tree/third-level , but seems that -- unsurprisingly -- some of the distributed sparse grid data management has changed for the widely distributed combination technique. This is why I thought it was the right time to leave a comment on the (in my opinion unneccessary) member Quoting @mhurler123 in case he has an opinion on that ;) |
|
|
||
| Stats::startEvent("combine global reduce init"); | ||
|
|
||
| Task::bufAsync = new std::vector<CombiDataType>[numGrids]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could be the case. We could add a delete before. Or switch to smart pointers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
or maybe make this a member of DistributedFullGridUniform? that is also connected to the next question...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The buffer is deleted in line 854
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could also put this as a member to the fullgrid directly. But I am not sure if this is improves things.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for(int g=0; g<numGrids; g++){ | ||
| CombiCom::distributedGlobalReduceAsyncInit( *combinedUniDSGVector_[g], Task::subspaceSizes[g], Task::bufAsync[g], Task::requestAsync[g]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
actually, I don't get why this is done once for each task -- a single time should suffice, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it is only done a single time. The numGrids does not refer to the number of tasks but to the number of grids each task owns. Usually numGrids is 1 but for example with multiple species in GENE numGrids=nspecies.
| assert(initialized_); | ||
|
|
||
| int lrank; | ||
| MPI_Comm_rank(lcomm, &lrank); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
=> auto lrank = theMPISystem()->getLocalRank(); -- use the buffered rank
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh, it's unused anyways ;)
|
oops, this was unintentionally closed by making the |
3 participants
No description provided.